Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21183791›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2011

Spontaneous abrogation of the G₂DNA damage checkpoint has clinical benefits but promotes leukemogenesis in Fanconi anemia patients.

Raphael Ceccaldi, Delphine Briot, Jérôme Larghero, Nadia Vasquez, Catherine Dubois d'Enghien, Delphine Chamousset, Maria-Elena Noguera, Quinten Waisfisz, Olivier Hermine, Corinne Pondarre and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Raphael CeccaldiINSERM U944, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Delphine Briot
Jérôme Larghero
Nadia Vasquez
Catherine Dubois d'Enghien
Delphine Chamousset
Maria-Elena Noguera
Quinten Waisfisz
Olivier Hermine
Corinne Pondarre
Thierry Leblanc
Eliane Gluckman
Hans Joenje
Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
Gérard Socié
Jean Soulier
Inserm · FRInstitut Curie · FRVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLEuropean Organisation for Rare Diseases · FRHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRHôpital Robert-Debré · FRHôpital Saint-Louis · FRInstitut d’Hématologie et d’Oncologie Pédiatrique · FRSaint Louis University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA damage checkpoints in the cell cycle may be important barriers against cancer progression in human cells. Fanconi anemia (FA) is an inherited DNA instability disorder that is associated with bone marrow failure and a strong predisposition to cancer. Although FA cells experience constitutive chromosomal breaks, cell cycle arrest at the G2 DNA damage checkpoint, and an excess of cell death, some patients do become clinically stable, and the mechanisms underlying this, other than spontaneous reversion of the disease-causing mutation, are not well understood. Here we have defined a clonal phenotype, termed attenuation, in which FA patients acquire an abrogation of the G2 checkpoint arrest. Attenuated cells expressed lower levels of CHK1 (also known as CHEK1) and p53. The attenuation could be recapitulated by modulating the ATR/CHK1 pathway, and CHK1 inhibition protected FA cells from cell death. FA patients who expressed the attenuated phenotype had mild bone marrow deficiency and reached adulthood, but several of them eventually developed myelodysplasia or leukemia. Better understanding of attenuation might help predict a patient's clinical course and guide choice of treatment. Our results also highlight the importance of evaluating the cellular DNA damage checkpoint and repair pathways in cancer therapies in general.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAdolescentAdultBase SequenceBone MarrowCheckpoint Kinase 1Checkpoint Kinase 2ChildChild, PreschoolFanconi AnemiaFemaleG2 PhaseHumansInfantLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleCheckpoint Kinase 1Checkpoint Kinase 2CHEK1 protein, humanCHEK2 protein, humanMatrix Metalloproteinase 1MMP1 protein, humanProtein KinasesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRNA, Small InterferingTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID21183791
PMCPMC3007150
OpenAlexW2049844811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.