Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21183760›Full record

ReviewMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making

Interactive media for diabetes self-management: issues in maximizing public health impact.

Russell E Glasgow

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Attitudes and Awareness Towards Diabetic Retinopathy Among Patients with Diabetes in Amman, Jordan.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A practical framework for encouraging and supporting positive behaviour change in diabetes.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2017
    Review
  12. 2017 National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Russell E GlasgowInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, USA. russg@re-aim.net

Funding

MED OFFICE INTERVENTION TO IMPROVE DIABETES SELF-CARER01DK035524 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE · PI KING, DIANE K · 1986 to 2011
$4.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK35524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes self-management presents a series of challenging tasks, and primary care, where the majority of cases of adult diabetes are treated, is hard-pressed to address these issues given competing demands. This article discusses how interactive media (IM) can be used to support diabetes self-management.

methodsFollowing a brief review of the literature, the 5 As framework for enhancing the effectiveness of health behavior counseling and the RE-AIM model for estimating and enhancing public health impact are used to frame discussion of the strengths and limitations of IM for diabetes shared decision making and self-management support.

resultsData and lessons learned from a series of randomized trials of IM for diabetes self-management education are summarized around 2 key issues. The first is enhancing patient engagement in decision making and includes enhancing user experience and engagement, improving quality of care, and promoting collaborative action planning and follow-up. The second is getting such resources into place and sustaining them in real-world primary care settings and involves enhancing participation at patient, clinician, and health care system levels and enhancing the generalizability of results.

conclusions. Key opportunities for IM to support diabetes self-management include assessment of information for shared decision making, assistance with problem-solving self-management challenges, and provision of follow-up support. A key current challenge is the linkage of IM supports to the rest of the patient's care, and collection of cost-effectiveness data is a key need for future research.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesCooperative BehaviorDecision MakingDiabetes MellitusHealth BehaviorHealth EducationHumansPatient-Centered CarePatient Education as TopicPeer GroupPublic HealthSelf Care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.