Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21183754›Full record

ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making

Estimation and validation of a multiattribute model of Alzheimer disease progression.

Eric Stallard, Bruce Kinosian, Arthur S Zbrozek, Anatoliy I Yashin, Henry A Glick, Yaakov Stern

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Validation and demonstration of a new comprehensive model of Alzheimer's disease progression.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The Predictors study: Development and baseline characteristics of the Predictors 3 cohort.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2017
    Article
  10. Predicting the progression of Alzheimer's disease dementia: A multidomain health policy model.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eric StallardDepartment of Sociology and Center for Population Health and Aging, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Bruce Kinosian
Arthur S Zbrozek
Anatoliy I Yashin
Henry A Glick
Yaakov Stern

Funding

PREDICTORS OF SEVERITY IN ALZHEIMERS DISEASER01AG007370 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI STERN, YAAKOV · 1989 to 2021
$16.6M
EVALUATING NEW GENETIC EFFECTS ON HEALTH AND AGING FROM LONGITUDINAL DATAR01AG030612 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI YASHIN, ANATOLIY I · 2007 to 2011
$2.9M
Healthy Life at Risk: The Role of SenescenceR01AG028259 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI YASHIN, ANATOLIY I · 2005 to 2009
$1.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG007370NIA NIH HHS R01 AG028259NIA NIH HHS R01 AG030612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo estimate and validate a multiattribute model of the clinical course of Alzheimer disease (AD) from mild AD to death in a high-quality prospective cohort study, and to estimate the impact of hypothetical modifications to AD progression rates on costs associated with Medicare and Medicaid services. DATA AND

methodsThe authors estimated sex-specific longitudinal Grade of Membership (GoM) models for AD patients (103 men, 149 women) in the initial cohort of the Predictors Study (1989-2001) based on 80 individual measures obtained every 6 mo for 10 y. These models were replicated for AD patients (106 men, 148 women) in the 2nd Predictors Study cohort (1997-2007). Model validation required that the disease-specific transition parameters be identical for both Predictors Study cohorts. Medicare costs were estimated from the National Long Term Care Survey.

resultsSex-specific models were validated using the 2nd Predictors Study cohort with the GoM transition parameters constrained to the values estimated for the 1st Predictors Study cohort; 57 to 61 of the 80 individual measures contributed significantly to the GoM models. Simulated, cost-free interventions in the rate of progression of AD indicated that large potential cost offsets could occur for patients at the earliest stages of AD.

conclusionsAD progression is characterized by a small number of parameters governing changes in large numbers of correlated indicators of AD severity. The analysis confirmed that the progression of AD represents a complex multidimensional physiological process that is similar across different study cohorts. The estimates suggested that there could be large cost offsets to Medicare and Medicaid from the slowing of AD progression among patients with mild AD. The methodology appears generally applicable in AD modeling.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesDisease ProgressionAgedAlzheimer DiseaseBayes TheoremBiomarkersDecision MakingFemaleHealth Status IndicatorsHumansLikelihood FunctionsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMarkov ChainsMedicaidMedicareBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID21183754
PMCPMC4392765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.