ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2011
Accessing the soil metagenome for studies of microbial diversity.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
87 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perseus: lineage-aware refinement of Kraken2 taxonomic classification for long read metagenomes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- The ecological context of enzymatic variation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Temporal Dynamics of Latent Fingerprint Microbiomes: A First Step to Decoding Crime Evidence.Genes · 2026Article
- An integrated multi-omic approach for discovery and dereplication of bioactive microbial natural products.Microbial genomics · 2025Article
- Unveiling soil microbial diversity through ultra-deep short-read metagenomic sequencing and co-assembly.iMeta · 2025Article
- New groups of highly divergent proteins in families as old as cellular life with important biological functions in the ocean.Environmental microbiome · 2025Article
- Article
- Metagenomic insights into short-term legume rotation: modulating potato rhizosphere microbiota to enhance tuber yield and quality.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Siderophore-mediated iron partition promotes dynamical coexistence between cooperators and cheaters.iScience · 2023Article
- Bacterial diversity in the aquatic system in India based on metagenome analysis-a critical review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2023Review
- Integrating Biochar, Bacteria, and Plants for Sustainable Remediation of Soils Contaminated with Organic Pollutants.Environmental science & technology · 2022Review
- Maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes induce the changes of rhizosphere microbial communities.Archives of microbiology · 2022Article
- Emerging Function of Ecotype-Specific Splicing in the Recruitment of Commensal Microbiome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Article
- Trends in Microbial Community Composition and Function by Soil Depth.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- Sequencing Depth Has a Stronger Effect than DNA Extraction on Soil Bacterial Richness Discovery.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- Analysis of Bacterial Communities by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing in a Melon-Producing Agro-environment.Microbial ecology · 2021Article
27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soil microbial communities contain the highest level of prokaryotic diversity of any environment, and metagenomic approaches involving the extraction of DNA from soil can improve our access to these communities. Most analyses of soil biodiversity and function assume that the DNA extracted represents the microbial community in the soil, but subsequent interpretations are limited by the DNA recovered from the soil. Unfortunately, extraction methods do not provide a uniform and unbiased subsample of metagenomic DNA, and as a consequence, accurate species distributions cannot be determined. Moreover, any bias will propagate errors in estimations of overall microbial diversity and may exclude some microbial classes from study and exploitation. To improve metagenomic approaches, investigate DNA extraction biases, and provide tools for assessing the relative abundances of different groups, we explored the biodiversity of the accessible community DNA by fractioning the metagenomic DNA as a function of (i) vertical soil sampling, (ii) density gradients (cell separation), (iii) cell lysis stringency, and (iv) DNA fragment size distribution. Each fraction had a unique genetic diversity, with different predominant and rare species (based on ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis [RISA] fingerprinting and phylochips). All fractions contributed to the number of bacterial groups uncovered in the metagenome, thus increasing the DNA pool for further applications. Indeed, we were able to access a more genetically diverse proportion of the metagenome (a gain of more than 80% compared to the best single extraction method), limit the predominance of a few genomes, and increase the species richness per sequencing effort. This work stresses the difference between extracted DNA pools and the currently inaccessible complete soil metagenome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.