Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21183614›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2011

Patient-specific computational hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms from 3D rotational angiography and CT angiography: an in vivo reproducibility study.

A J Geers, I Larrabide, A G Radaelli, H Bogunovic, M Kim, H A F Gratama van Andel, C B Majoie, E VanBavel, A F Frangi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05526352 (@neurIST), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05526352 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

@neurIST : Informatique biomédicale intégrée Pour la Gestion Des anévrismes cérébraux

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Hospital, GenevaRan2015 to 2040Enrolled20,000ConditionsIntracranial Aneurysm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

A J GeersCenter for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
I Larrabide
A G Radaelli
H Bogunovic
M Kim
H A F Gratama van Andel
C B Majoie
E VanBavel
A F Frangi
Academic Medical Center · NLPompeu Fabra University · ESCentre for Biomedical Engineering and Physics · SESimulation Technologies (United States) · USUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposePatient-specific simulations of the hemodynamics in intracranial aneurysms can be constructed by using image-based vascular models and CFD techniques. This work evaluates the impact of the choice of imaging technique on these simulations. MATERIALS AND

methodsTen aneurysms, imaged with 3DRA and CTA, were analyzed to assess the reproducibility of geometric and hemodynamic variables across the 2 modalities.

resultsCompared with 3DRA models, we found that CTA models often had larger aneurysm necks (P = .05) and that most of the smallest vessels (between 0.7 and 1.0 mm in diameter) could not be reconstructed successfully with CTA. With respect to the values measured in the 3DRA models, the flow rate differed by 14.1 ± 2.8% (mean ± SE) just proximal to the aneurysm and 33.9 ± 7.6% at the aneurysm neck. The mean WSS on the aneurysm differed by 44.2 ± 6.0%. Even when normalized to the parent vessel WSS, a difference of 31.4 ± 9.9% remained, with the normalized WSS in most cases being larger in the CTA model (P = .04). Despite these substantial differences, excellent agreement (κ ≥ 0.9) was found for qualitative variables that describe the flow field, such as the structure of the flow pattern and the flow complexity.

conclusionsAlthough relatively large differences were found for all evaluated quantitative hemodynamic variables, the main flow characteristics were reproduced across imaging modalities.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular CirculationModels, CardiovascularAdultAgedBlood Flow VelocityCerebral AngiographyComputer SimulationFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsRotationSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID21183614
PMCPMC8013098
OpenAlexW2113635125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.