Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21181176›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2011

Late-breaking clinical trials presented at the American Heart Association Congress in Chicago 2010.

Christoph Gensch, Uta Hoppe, Michael Böhm, Ulrich Laufs

Abstract readConference Proceedings
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Hotline update of clinical trials and registries presented at the American College of Cardiology Congress 2011.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2011
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christoph GenschKlinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany. christophgensch@gmx.de
Uta Hoppe
Michael Böhm
Ulrich Laufs

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article gives an overview on the late-breaking clinical trials in the field of cardiovascular medicine which were presented during the hotline sessions at the American Heart Association Congress, held in Chicago, USA, from 13 to 17th November 2010. The data have been presented by leading experts in the field with relevant positions in the trials. The summaries provided in the manuscript were generated from the oral presentations and the webcasts of the American Heart Association (Laufs in Clin Res Cardiol 97:1-11, 2008; Möllmann in Clin Res Cardiol 98:1-7, 2009). The following papers are discussed in alphabetical order: ACT, ADVANCE, ASCEND-HF, ASCOT-CRP, CLOSURE I, DEFINE, EMPHASIS-HF, GRAVITAS, P-OM3, RAFT, ROCKET-AF, SMART-AV, SYMPLICITY HTN-2, TELE-HF, TIM-HF.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCardiologyCardiovascular DiseasesClinical Trials as TopicHumansUnited States

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.