Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21180633›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2010

A randomized, blinded, parallel-group, pilot trial of mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept) compared with interferon beta-1a (Avonex) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Elliot M Frohman, Gary Cutter, Gina Remington, Hongjiang Gao, Howard Rossman, Bianca Weinstock-Guttman, Jacqueline E Durfee, Amy Conger, Ellen Carl, Katherine Treadaway and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mycophenolate mofetil for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Role of immunosuppressive therapy for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2013
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Current and emerging therapies in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2012
    Article
  10. Mycophenolate mofetil in combination with interferon beta-1a in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A preliminary study.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Elliot M FrohmanDepartments of Neurology and Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Gary Cutter
Gina Remington
Hongjiang Gao
Howard Rossman
Bianca Weinstock-Guttman
Jacqueline E Durfee
Amy Conger
Ellen Carl
Katherine Treadaway
Eric Lindzen
Amber Salter
Teresa C Frohman
Anjali Shah
Angela Bates
Jennifer L Cox
Michael G Dwyer
Olaf Stüve
Benjamin M Greenberg
Michael K Racke
Robert Zivadinov
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USBuffalo Psychiatric Center · USJacobs Institute · USMichigan Institute for Neurological Disorders · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMycophenolate mofetil (MMF, CellCept®) has been utilized as an antirejection agent in transplant recipients and in patients with myriad autoimmune disorders including multiple sclerosis (MS).

objectiveTo investigate radiographic and clinical safety involving monotherapy use of daily oral MMF (1 g b.i.d.) versus weekly intramuscular interferon beta 1a (Avonex® at 30 mcg) in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS).

methodsWe organized a randomized, serial, 6-monthly, MRI-blinded, parallel-group multicenter pilot study to determine the safety of MMF versus interferon beta monotherapy in 35 untreated patients with RRMS, all of whom exhibited evidence of gadolinium (Gd) enhancement on a screening MRI of the brain. The primary outcome was the reduction in the cumulative mean number of combined active lesions (CAL), new Gd-enhancing lesions, and new T2 lesions on MRI analyses.

resultsBoth interferon beta and MMF appeared safe and well tolerated in the majority of patients. There was no difference between MMF therapy and the standard regimen of interferon beta therapy on the primary safety MRI endpoints of the study. However, the MMF group showed a trend toward a lower accumulation of combined active lesions, CAL, Gd and T2 lesions when compared with interferon beta treated patients.

conclusionsThe results from this pilot study suggest that the application of MMF monotherapy in MS deserves further exploration.

Indexed as

CellCeptimmunosuppressioninterferon beta 1aMRI activitymycophenolate mofetilrelapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID21180633
PMCPMC3002613
OpenAlexW2160885927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.