ArticleAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2010
The impact of student-faculty ratio on pharmacy faculty scholarship.
Article in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scholarly productivity of non-pharmacy practice faculty in U.S. schools and colleges of pharmacy, 2019-2023.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- Article
- Report of the 2017-2018 Strategic Engagement Standing Committee.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2018Article
- Cultivating 'habits of mind' in the scholarly pharmacy clinician: report of the 2011-12 Argus Commission.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2012Article
- Determining student-faculty ratios and faculty scholarship levels/rates.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2010Article
- Determining student-faculty ratios and faculty scholarship levels/rates.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the relationship and impact of student-faculty ratio on scholarship of pharmacy faculty members.
methodsThe number and rank of faculty members, pharmacy program characteristics, and faculty productivity data were collected to determine the impact of student-faculty ratio on faculty scholarship.
resultsFaculty scholarship was not predicted by student-faculty ratio. Factors impacting positively on faculty productivity included National Institutes of Health funding; presence of clinical associate professors, instructors, and lecturers; and programs located in public universities.
conclusionsFaculty productivity is not related to the student-faculty ratio, wherein more faculty members and fewer students equates to increased scholarship. However, public universities may have different infrastructures which are associated with greater academic productivity compared to private institutions. Additionally, utilizing instructors and clinical or nontenure-track faculty members can significantly increase scholarship among faculty members.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.