Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21179118›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2011

Imaging techniques for assaying lymphocyte activation in action.

Lakshmi Balagopalan, Eilon Sherman, Valarie A Barr, Lawrence E Samelson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A roadmap for translational cancer glycoimmunology at single cell resolution.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Spectral Analysis of ATP-Dependent Mechanical Vibrations in T Cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. T Cell Reprogramming Against Cancer.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lakshmi BalagopalanLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Eilon Sherman
Valarie A Barr
Lawrence E Samelson

Funding

Biochemical Basis of T Cell ActivationZIABC010304 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SAMELSON, LAWRENCE · 2009 to 2025
$36.3M
Confocal Core for the Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular BiologyZICBC010978 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI PALLIKKUTH, SANDEEP · 2009 to 2025
$7.6M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS Y99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging techniques have greatly improved our understanding of lymphocyte activation. Technical advances in spatial and temporal resolution and new labelling tools have enabled researchers to directly observe the activation process. Consequently, research using imaging approaches to study lymphocyte activation has expanded, providing an unprecedented level of cellular and molecular detail in the field. As a result, certain models of lymphocyte activation have been verified, others have been revised and yet others have been replaced with new concepts. In this article, we review the current imaging techniques that are used to assess lymphocyte activation in different contexts, from whole animals to single molecules, and discuss the advantages and potential limitations of these methods.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigen-Presenting CellsCell CommunicationFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferLymphocyte ActivationMiceMicroscopyT-Lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID21179118
PMCPMC3403683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.