Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21178448›Full record

ArticleVirulence

Response of corneal epithelial cells to Staphylococcus aureus.

Susan R Heimer, Ai Yamada, Hugh Russell, Michael Gilmore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virulence. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Immunity and pain in the eye: focus on the ocular surface.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2022
    Review
  2. Transcription Factor EepR Is Required forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  3. Microbial Warfare on Three Fronts: Mixed Biofilm ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  4. Development and Characterization of High-ThroughputFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The Pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus Eye Infections.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susan R HeimerHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ai Yamada
Hugh Russell
Michael Gilmore

Funding

Adherence and Colonization in KeratitisR01EY017381 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GILMORE, MICHAEL S · 2007 to 2011
$2.0M
Importance of adhesin-like proteins of Enteroccocus faeciumR01AI067861 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MURRAY, BARBARA E · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
Pilus Assembly in Gram-Positive BacteriaR01AI061381 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI TON-THAT, HUNG · 2006 to 2010
$1.6M
NEI NIH HHS EY017381NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017381NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI061381NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI067861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of invasive infection. It also infects wet mucosal tissues including the cornea and conjunctiva. Conflicting evidence exists on the expression of Toll-like receptors by human corneal epithelial cells. It was therefore of interest to determine how epithelial cells from this immune privileged tissue respond to S. aureus. Further, it was of interest to determine whether cytolytic toxins, with the potential to cause ion flux or potentially permit effector molecule movement across the target cell membrane, alter the response. Microarrays were used to globally assess the response of human corneal epithelial cells to S. aureus. A large increase in abundance of transcripts encoding the antimicrobial dendritic cell chemokine, CCL20, was observed. CCL20 release into the medium was detected, and this response was found to be largely TLR2 and NOD2 independent. Corneal epithelial cells also respond to S. aureus by increasing the intracellular abundance of mRNA for inflammatory mediators, transcription factors, and genes related to MAP kinase pathways, in ways similar to other cell types. The corneal epithelial cell response was surprisingly unaffected by toxin exposure. Toxin exposure did, however, induce a stress response. Although model toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains of S. aureus were employed in the present study, the results obtained were strikingly similar to those reported for stimulation of vaginal epithelial cells by clinical toxic shock toxin expressing isolates, demonstrating that the initial epithelial cellular responses to S. aureus are largely independent of strain as well as epithelial cell tissue source.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingHost-Pathogen InteractionsCells, CulturedChemokine CCL20CorneaEpithelial CellsEpithelium, CornealGene Expression RegulationHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProteinsRNA, MessengerStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusVirulenceCCL20 protein, humanChemokine CCL20ProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID21178448
PMCPMC3073293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.