Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21177962›Full record

ArticleGenome research2011

The transcriptional diversity of 25 Drosophila cell lines.

Lucy Cherbas, Aarron Willingham, Dayu Zhang, Li Yang, Yi Zou, Brian D Eads, Joseph W Carlson, Jane M Landolin, Philipp Kapranov, Jacqueline Dumais and 23 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 180 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
180citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

180 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advancing insect research through cell line transcriptomics.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A genome-wide survey reveals a diverse array of enhancers coordinate thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Journal of virology · 2025
    Article
  12. iScience · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

120 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Lucy CherbasCenter for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA. cherbas@indiana.edu
Aarron Willingham
Dayu Zhang
Li Yang
Yi Zou
Brian D Eads
Joseph W Carlson
Jane M Landolin
Philipp Kapranov
Jacqueline Dumais
Anastasia Samsonova
Jeong-Hyeon Choi
Johnny Roberts
Carrie A Davis
Haixu Tang
Marijke J van Baren
Srinka Ghosh
Alexander Dobin
Kim Bell
Wei Lin
Laura Langton
Michael O Duff
Aaron E Tenney
Chris Zaleski
Michael R Brent
Roger A Hoskins
Thomas C Kaufman
Justen Andrews
Brenton R Graveley
Norbert Perrimon
Susan E Celniker
Thomas R Gingeras
Peter Cherbas

Funding

Comprehensive characterization of the Drosophila transcriptomeU01HG004271 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI CELNIKER, SUSAN E · 2007 to 2011
$18.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster cell lines are important resources for cell biologists. Here, we catalog the expression of exons, genes, and unannotated transcriptional signals for 25 lines. Unannotated transcription is substantial (typically 19% of euchromatic signal). Conservatively, we identify 1405 novel transcribed regions; 684 of these appear to be new exons of neighboring, often distant, genes. Sixty-four percent of genes are expressed detectably in at least one line, but only 21% are detected in all lines. Each cell line expresses, on average, 5885 genes, including a common set of 3109. Expression levels vary over several orders of magnitude. Major signaling pathways are well represented: most differentiation pathways are "off" and survival/growth pathways "on." Roughly 50% of the genes expressed by each line are not part of the common set, and these show considerable individuality. Thirty-one percent are expressed at a higher level in at least one cell line than in any single developmental stage, suggesting that each line is enriched for genes characteristic of small sets of cells. Most remarkable is that imaginal disc-derived lines can generally be assigned, on the basis of expression, to small territories within developing discs. These mappings reveal unexpected stability of even fine-grained spatial determination. No two cell lines show identical transcription factor expression. We conclude that each line has retained features of an individual founder cell superimposed on a common "cell line" gene expression pattern.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationTranscription, GeneticAnimalsCell LineCluster AnalysisDrosophila melanogasterExonsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingMaleMolecular Sequence DataSignal TransductionTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21177962
PMCPMC3032933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.