Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21177899›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2011

Role of the clinical mycobacteriology laboratory in diagnosis and management of tuberculosis in low-prevalence settings.

Nicole M Parrish, Karen C Carroll

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Revolutionizing diagnosis of pulmonaryFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Tuberculosis and Other Airborne Microbes in Occupational Health and Safety.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  11. Determinants of losses in the latent tuberculosis cascade of care in Brazil: A retrospective cohort study.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Hepatitis in slaughterhouse workers.World journal of hepatology · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Front loading sputum microscopy - an alternative approach for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2017
    Article
  20. The implications of whole-genome sequencing in the control of tuberculosis.Therapeutic advances in infectious disease · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicole M ParrishJohns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. nparrish@jhmi.edu
Karen C Carroll

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a global epidemic, despite a significant decline in reported cases in the United States between 2008 and 2009. While the exact nature of this decline is unclear, one thing remains certain: TB, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) TB, is no longer restricted to developing regions of the globe. It is of vital importance that both public and private mycobacteriology laboratories maintain the ability to detect and identify Mycobacterium tuberculosis from patient specimens, as well as correctly determine the presence of antibiotic resistance. To do this effectively requires careful attention to preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical aspects of testing. Respiratory specimens require digestion and concentration followed by fluorescence microscopy. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends the performance of a direct nucleic acid amplification method, regardless of smear results, on specimens from patients in whom the suspicion of tuberculosis is high. Liquid-based technologies are more rapid and sensitive for the detection of M. tuberculosis in culture and nucleic acid probes, but biochemicals are preferred for identification once growth is detected. Susceptibility testing is most often done using either the agar proportion method or a commercial broth system. New genotypic and phenotypic methods of susceptibility testing include first- and second-line agents and are promising, though not yet widely available. Finally, gamma interferon release assays are preferred to the tuberculin skin test for screening certain at-risk populations, and new CDC guidelines are available that assist clinicians in their use.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsBacteriological TechniquesHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMycobacterium tuberculosisPrevalenceTuberculosisUnited StatesAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID21177899
PMCPMC3067741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.