Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21177679›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2011

Costs of memory: lessons from 'mini' brains.

James G Burns, Julien Foucaud, Frederic Mery

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evolution of neurometabolic frugality in harvester ants.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A diabetes-like biochemical and behavioural phenotype ofProceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Experimental evidence of memory-based foraging decisions in a large wild mammal.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Pollen feeding inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James G BurnsDepartment of Biology, University of Toronto at Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Julien Foucaud
Frederic Mery

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variation in learning and memory abilities among closely related species, or even among populations of the same species, has opened research into the relationship between cognition, ecological context and the fitness costs, and benefits of learning and memory. Such research programmes have long been dominated by vertebrate studies and by the assumption of a relationship between cognitive abilities, brain size and metabolic costs. Research on these 'large brained' organisms has provided important insights into the understanding of cognitive functions and their adaptive value. In the present review, we discuss some aspects of the fitness costs of learning and memory by focusing on 'mini-brain' studies. Research on learning and memory in insects has challenged some traditional positions and is pushing the boundaries of our understanding of the evolution of learning and memory.

Indexed as

MemoryAnimalsBrainCognitionEnergy MetabolismInsectaLearningOrgan Size

Identifiers

PMID21177679
PMCPMC3049060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.