Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21177341›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2011

Small micromeres contribute to the germline in the sea urchin.

Mamiko Yajima, Gary M Wessel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Annelids as models of germ cell and gonad regeneration.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2024
    Review
  3. Semi-automated, high-content imaging of drug transporter knockout sea urchin (Lytechinus pictus) embryos.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Embryonic Origin of Primordial Germ Cells in the TardigradebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Multicellularity in animals: The potential for within-organism conflict.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Somatic cell conversion to a germ cell lineage: A violation or a revelation?Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Gastrulation in the sea urchin.Current topics in developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mamiko YajimaMCB Department, Brown University, 185 Meeting Street, BOX-GL173, Providence, RI 02912, USA. mamiko_yajima@brown.edu
Gary M Wessel
Brown University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many indirect developing animals create specialized multipotent cells in early development to construct the adult body and perhaps to hold the fate of the primordial germ cells. In sea urchin embryos, small micromeres formed at the fifth division appear to be such multipotent cells: they are relatively quiescent in embryos, but contribute significantly to the coelomic sacs of the larvae, from which the major tissues of the adult rudiment are derived. These cells appear to be regulated by a conserved gene set that includes the classic germline lineage genes vasa, nanos and piwi. In vivo lineage mapping of the cells awaits genetic manipulation of the lineage, but previous research has demonstrated that the germline is not specified at the fourth division because animals are fertile even when micromeres, the parent blastomeres of small micromeres, are deleted. Here, we have deleted small micromeres at the fifth division and have raised the resultant larvae to maturity. These embryos developed normally and did not overexpress Vasa, as did embryos from a micromere deletion, implying the compensatory gene regulatory network was not activated in small micromere-deleted embryos. Adults from control and micromere-deleted embryos developed gonads and visible gametes, whereas small micromere-deleted animals formed small gonads that lacked gametes. Quantitative PCR results indicate that small micromere-deleted animals produce background levels of germ cell products, but not specifically eggs or sperm. These results suggest that germline specification depends on the small micromeres, either directly as lineage products, or indirectly by signaling mechanisms emanating from the small micromeres or their descendants.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBase SequenceBlastomeresDNA PrimersFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGerm CellsLytechinusMaleModels, BiologicalMorphogenesisMultipotent Stem CellsDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID21177341
PMCPMC3005600
OpenAlexW2170715038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.