ArticleBMC bioinformatics2010
New insights into protein-protein interaction data lead to increased estimates of the S. cerevisiae interactome size.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental assessment of AI-based interactome mapping.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Targeting stressor-induced dysfunctions in protein-protein interaction networks via epichaperomes.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2023Review
- CPIELA: Computational Prediction of Plant Protein-Protein Interactions by Ensemble Learning Approach From Protein Sequences and Evolutionary Information.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Protein-Protein Interactions inFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Review
- Determining the minimum number of protein-protein interactions required to support known protein complexes.PloS one · 2018Article
- Bacterial protein meta-interactomes predict cross-species interactions and protein function.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Non-interacting proteins may resemble interacting proteins: prevalence and implications.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- A Multi-Method Approach for Proteomic Network Inference in 11 Human Cancers.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Protein-protein interactions and genetic diseases: The interactome.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2014Review
- Reconstituting protein interaction networks using parameter-dependent domain-domain interactions.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- Counting motifs in the human interactome.Nature communications · 2013Article
- Complementing the Eukaryotic Protein Interactome.PloS one · 2013Article
- A computational framework for boosting confidence in high-throughput protein-protein interaction datasets.Genome biology · 2012Article
- BIPS: BIANA Interolog Prediction Server. A tool for protein-protein interaction inference.Nucleic acids research · 2012Article
- Diversity in genetic in vivo methods for protein-protein interaction studies: from the yeast two-hybrid system to the mammalian split-luciferase system.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2012Review
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Clostridium difficille interactomes: demonstration of rapid development of computational system for bacterial interactome prediction.Microbial informatics and experimentation · 2012Article
- What evidence is there for the homology of protein-protein interactions?PLoS computational biology · 2012Article
- Categorizing biases in high-confidence high-throughput protein-protein interaction data sets.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs protein interactions mediate most cellular mechanisms, protein-protein interaction networks are essential in the study of cellular processes. Consequently, several large-scale interactome mapping projects have been undertaken, and protein-protein interactions are being distilled into databases through literature curation; yet protein-protein interaction data are still far from comprehensive, even in the model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Estimating the interactome size is important for evaluating the completeness of current datasets, in order to measure the remaining efforts that are required.
resultsWe examined the yeast interactome from a new perspective, by taking into account how thoroughly proteins have been studied. We discovered that the set of literature-curated protein-protein interactions is qualitatively different when restricted to proteins that have received extensive attention from the scientific community. In particular, these interactions are less often supported by yeast two-hybrid, and more often by more complex experiments such as biochemical activity assays. Our analysis showed that high-throughput and literature-curated interactome datasets are more correlated than commonly assumed, but that this bias can be corrected for by focusing on well-studied proteins. We thus propose a simple and reliable method to estimate the size of an interactome, combining literature-curated data involving well-studied proteins with high-throughput data. It yields an estimate of at least 37, 600 direct physical protein-protein interactions in S. cerevisiae.
conclusionsOur method leads to higher and more accurate estimates of the interactome size, as it accounts for interactions that are genuine yet difficult to detect with commonly-used experimental assays. This shows that we are even further from completing the yeast interactome map than previously expected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.