Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21175443›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2010

Evaluation of a QT nomogram for risk assessment after antidepressant overdose.

W Stephen Waring, Ann Graham, Julie Gray, Allen D Wilson, Catherine Howell, D Nicholas Bateman

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. QT interval prolongation andTherapeutic advances in drug safety · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Lack of relationship between plasma levels of escitalopram and QTc-interval length.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Propofol-associated QTc prolongation.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2016
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Mirtazapine overdose is unlikely to cause major toxicity.Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2014
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Citalopram and cardiac toxicity.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2013
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Towards a better understanding of QT interval variability.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2011
    Review
  20. Editors' pick 2010.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

W Stephen WaringScottish Poisons Information Bureau, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, UK. stephen.waring@york.nhs.uk
Ann Graham
Julie Gray
Allen D Wilson
Catherine Howell
D Nicholas Bateman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsA QT-heart rate nomogram has recently been proposed as a means of identifying patients at risk of torsades de pointes after antidepressant overdose, based on published cases of drug-induced torsades de pointes. The present study sought to examine the performance of the nomogram in patients who ingest an antidepressant overdose but do not develop arrhythmia.

methodsA retrospective case control study of patients presenting to hospital after overdose of citalopram, mirtazapine and venlafaxine was carried out. The primary outcome variable was QT higher than the nomogram, and was compared with occurrence of QT(c) (QT corrected by Bazett's formula) greater than ≥440 ms and QT(c) ≥500 ms, with comparison between drugs. Data are expressed as proportions in each group with 95% confidence intervals.

resultsThere were 858 electrocardiograms from 541 patients. QT was higher than the nomogram in 2.4% (1.4, 4.1%), whereas QT(c) was ≥440 ms in 23.1% (95% CI 19.8, 26.8%), and QT(c) was ≥500 ms in 1.1% (0.5, 2.5%). Citalopram overdose was more likely to be associated with QT higher than the nomogram compared with the other agents (difference 7.0%, 95% CI 2.9, 11.9%, P = 0.001) and more likely to be associated with QT(c) ≥440 ms (difference = 11.0%, 95% CI 2.6, 19.0%, P = 0.013).

conclusionsThe QT nomogram was associated with a lower false positive rate than widely accepted QT(c) criteria, and allowed detection of different effects of individual drugs. The nomogram offers potential advantages over QT(c) criteria and merits further investigation in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

NomogramsAdultAntidepressive AgentsCitalopramCyclohexanolsDrug OverdoseElectrocardiographyFemaleHeart RateHumansLong QT SyndromeMaleMianserinMirtazapineRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentAntidepressive AgentsCitalopramCyclohexanolsMianserinMirtazapineVenlafaxine Hydrochloride

Identifiers

PMID21175443
PMCPMC3014071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.