ReviewDrugs2011
Histamine dihydrochloride: in the management of acute myeloid leukaemia.
Review in Drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spotlight on histamine dihydrochloride in acute myeloid leukaemia.Drugs & aging · 2011Trial
- Targeting histamine H4 receptor improves anti-tumoral response in a murine model of breast cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Histamine H4 Receptor Agonism Induces Antitumor Effects in Human T-Cell Lymphoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Review
- Histamine in cancer immunology and immunotherapy. Current status and new perspectives.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2021Review
- Immune Biology of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Implications for Immunotherapy.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021Review
- Histamine receptors and cancer pharmacology: an update.British journal of pharmacology · 2020Review
- Pathophysiological Role of Histamine H4 Receptor in Cancer: Therapeutic Implications.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Article
- DNA-mediated adjuvant immunotherapy extends survival in two different mouse models of myeloid malignancies.Oncotarget · 2015Article
- Selective cytoprotective effect of histamine on doxorubicin-induced hepatic and cardiac toxicity in animal models.Cell death discovery · 2015Article
- Optimal therapy for adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission.Current treatment options in oncology · 2014Review
- TGF- β: an important mediator of allergic disease and a molecule with dual activity in cancer development.Journal of immunology research · 2014Review
- Molecular and cellular analysis of human histamine receptor subtypes.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2013Review
- Radioprotective potential of histamine on rat small intestine and uterus.European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2012Article
- Pharmaceutical characterization and exploration of Arkeshwara rasa in MDA-MB-231 cells.Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Histamine dihydrochloride (Ceplene) is a synthetic derivative of the biogenic amine histamine. Histamine dihydrochloride inhibits the formation of reactive oxygen species that suppress the activation of T cells and natural killer cells. When administered in addition to the cytokine interleukin (IL)-2, histamine dihydrochloride enables the activation of T cells and natural killer cells by IL-2, resulting in the killing of tumour cells of various cancers, including acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). In a 3-year, randomized, multicentre, phase III trial in adult patients with AML in first or subsequent remission, those who received subcutaneous histamine dihydrochloride and concomitant subcutaneous IL-2 as maintenance therapy had a significantly longer leukaemia-free survival (LFS; primary endpoint) than recipients of no treatment. This difference was also shown for the subgroup of patients in first remission. The between-group difference in overall survival (OS) was not significant, although this trial was not powered to detect such a difference. Histamine dihydrochloride and IL-2 therapy had an acceptable tolerability profile in patients in the phase III trial. The majority of reported adverse events were grade 1 or 2 of the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. The most commonly reported grade 3 adverse events with active treatment were thrombocytopenia, headache, neutropenia, pyrexia, eosinophilia and diarrhoea; grade 4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia and leukopenia not otherwise specified. Serious adverse events were mostly relapse related. Histamine dihydrochloride and IL-2 as maintenance therapy significantly prolonged LFS compared with no treatment and had an acceptable tolerability profile in a large phase III trial in patients with AML. Although some issues remain to be addressed, most notably the effects of therapy on OS and the efficacy of treatment in older patients, histamine dihydrochloride in addition to IL-2 appears to be a useful maintenance therapy option for adult patients with AML in remission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.