Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21174421›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2011

Calculation of local water densities in biological systems: a comparison of molecular dynamics simulations and the 3D-RISM-KH molecular theory of solvation.

Martin C Stumpe, Nikolay Blinov, David Wishart, Andriy Kovalenko, Vijay S Pande

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Applications of water molecules for analysis of macromolecule properties.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. HierarchicalJournal of applied crystallography · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Martin C StumpeDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive West, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Nikolay Blinov
David Wishart
Andriy Kovalenko
Vijay S Pande

Funding

Physics-based Simulation of Biological Structures(RMI)U54GM072970 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALTMAN, RUSS BIAGIO · 2004 to 2013
$33.5M
Center for Protein Folding Machinery (RMI)PN1EY016525 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI CHIU, WAH · 2004 to 2004
$67k
NEI NIH HHS PN1 EY016525NEI NIH HHS PN1 EY016525-02NIGMS NIH HHS GM072970NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM072970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water plays a unique role in all living organisms. Not only is it nature's ubiquitous solvent, but it also actively takes part in many cellular processes. In particular, the structure and properties of interfacial water near biomolecules such as proteins are often related to the function of the respective molecule. It can therefore be highly instructive to study the local water density around solutes in cellular systems, particularly when solvent-mediated forces such as the hydrophobic effect are relevant. Computational methods such as molecular dynamics (MD) simulations seem well suited to study these systems at the atomic level. However, due to sampling requirements, it is not clear that MD simulations are, indeed, the method of choice to obtain converged densities at a given level of precision. We here compare the calculation of local water densities with two different methods: MD simulations and the three-dimensional reference interaction site model with the Kovalenko-Hirata closure (3D-RISM-KH). In particular, we investigate the convergence of the local water density to assess the required simulation times for different levels of resolution. Moreover, we provide a quantitative comparison of the densities calculated with MD and with 3D-RISM-KH and investigate the effect of the choice of the water model for both methods. Our results show that 3D-RISM-KH yields density distributions that are very similar to those from MD up to a 0.5 Å resolution, but for significantly reduced computational cost. The combined use of MD and 3D-RISM-KH emerges as an auspicious perspective for efficient solvent sampling in dynamical systems.

Indexed as

Mathematical ComputingChaperonin 10Chaperonin 60CrystallizationMacromolecular SubstancesModels, ChemicalMolecular Dynamics SimulationSolubilitySolutionsSolventsSpecific GravitySurface PropertiesThermodynamicsWaterChaperonin 10Chaperonin 60Macromolecular SubstancesSolutionsSolventsWater

Identifiers

PMID21174421
PMCPMC3407544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.