ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2011
[Urinary tract infections after kidney transplantation: Essen algorithm for calculated antibiotic treatment].
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antibiotic resistance of urinary pathogens after kidney transplantation: a 10-year single-center survey in Germany.Infection · 2025Article
- Increased resistance of gram-negative urinary pathogens after kidney transplantation.BMC nephrology · 2017Article
- The Reasons of Renal Transplant Recipients' Admission to the Emergency Department; a Case Series Study.Emergency (Tehran, Iran) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urinary tract infections are the most common infection early after transplantation and can affect long-term graft function. Any urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients should be seen as "complex" with regard to consequences for diagnosis and therapy. The increase in resistance to anti-infective agents seen among uropathogens is one of the central therapeutic problems. This means for routine clinical practice that contact isolation precautions should be consistently implemented for affected patients and the duration of introducing urinary tract instruments should be minimized. Detection of pyuria and urine cultures are required to confirm infection, to identify the corresponding pathogen, and to review the antibiotic therapy.The "Essen algorithm for calculated antibiotic treatment of urinary tract infections in renal transplant patients" takes into consideration the high incidence of Gram-negative pathogens in general and the increased incidence of enterococci in the early phase after transplantation. Within the first 2 months after transplantation quinolones should be used and later cephalosporins. In case of urosepsis, calculated antibiotic therapy should cover problematic Gram-negative pathogens such as pseudomonades. The calculated antibiotic therapy should be administered intravenously in severe infections. In any case the local and regional antibiotic susceptibility should be taken into account when deciding on the calculated antibiotic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.