ArticleEuropean radiology2011
From multislice CT to whole-body biomarker imaging in lymphoma patients.
Article in European radiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging versus FDG-PET/CT for initial lymphoma staging: systematic review on diagnostic test accuracy studies.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicinaPooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Until recently, only nuclear medicine techniques allowed combining whole-body anatomical and functional information. Now, diffusion-weighted imaging seeks to compete with these techniques in the field of oncology, providing assessment of tumour spread, characterizing lesions and evaluating therapeutic response. The first issue has been widely evaluated since the first published whole-body diffusion-weighted images looking like scintigraphy. Optimal background suppression and diffusion weighting highlighted tumours with restricted diffusion. For the two latter issues, ADC seems to represent the key element; it should allow differentiation between benign and malignant tissue, and active from inactive lesions after treatment. This is of paramount importance for the monitoring of lymphomas treated with chemotherapy alone, or for solid tumors treated by neoadjuvant therapies. However, imaging protocols still differ between studies, and there is considerable overlap in ADC values between healthy and neoplastic tissues. Despite this difficulty to identify a clinically reliable threshold for malignancy, there is no doubt that ADC will represent as a reliable biomarker in the future for some malignancies, and lymphomas represent a helpful model for this purpose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.