Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21173309›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2011

Development of a secondary immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis is independent of Toll-like receptor 2.

Amanda McBride, Kamlesh Bhatt, Padmini Salgame

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. eLife · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda McBrideUniversity of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Department of Medicine, Center for Emerging Pathogens, Newark, NJ 07101, USA.
Kamlesh Bhatt
Padmini Salgame
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

TLR2 Regulation of Host Immune Response in TBR21AI071844 · NIAID · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI SALGAME, PADMINI · 2007 to 2008
$425k
Immunosuppressive Role of TLR2 in Host Immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosisF30HL094028 · NHLBI · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI MCBRIDE, AMANDA B. · 2008 to 2011
$121k
NHLBI NIH HHS F30 HL094028NHLBI NIH HHS F30HL094028NIAID NIH HHS AI071844NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI071844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Published work indicates that the contribution of Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) to host resistance during acute Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection is marginal. However, in these studies, TLR2 participation in the memory immune response to M. tuberculosis was not determined. The substantial in vitro evidence that M. tuberculosis strongly triggers TLR2 on dendritic cells and macrophages to bring about either activation or inhibition of antigen-presenting cell (APC) functions, along with accumulating evidence that memory T cell development can be calibrated by TLR signals, led us to question the role of TLR2 in host resistance to secondary challenge with M. tuberculosis. To address this question, a memory immunity model was employed, and the response of TLR2-deficient (TLR2 knockout [TLR2KO]) mice following a secondary exposure to M. tuberculosis was compared to that of wild-type (WT) mice based on assessment of the bacterial burden, recall response, phenotype of recruited T cells, and granulomatous response. We found that upon rechallenge with M. tuberculosis, both WT and TLR2KO immune mice displayed similarly enhanced resistance to infection in comparison to their naïve counterparts. The frequencies of M. tuberculosis-specific gamma interferon (IFN-γ)-producing T cells, the phenotypes of recruited T cells, and the granulomatous responses were also similar between WT and TLR2KO immune mice. Together, the findings from this study indicate that TLR2 signaling does not influence memory immunity to M. tuberculosis.

Indexed as

AnimalsImmunologic MemoryLymphocyte ActivationMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutMycobacterium tuberculosisReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionToll-Like Receptor 2TuberculosisTlr2 protein, mouseToll-Like Receptor 2

Identifiers

PMID21173309
PMCPMC3067489
OpenAlexW2137668986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.