Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21172999›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2011

Earliest appropriate time for administering neurobehavioral assessment in newborn infants.

Yingying Xu, Kimberly Yolton, Jane Khoury

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00129324 (Neurobehavioral Effects of Prevalent Neurotoxicants in Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00129324 nacompletednot on this map

Neurobehavioral Effects of Prevalent Neurotoxicants in Children: A Cohort Study of the Cincinnati Center for Children's Environmental Health

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)Ran2003 to 2018Enrolled468ConditionsEnvironmental Exposures, Child Development, Lead and Injury ReductionArmsLead Hazard Control Intervention, Injury Hazard Control Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Grandchild of the NBAS: the NICU network neurobehavioral scale (NNNS): a review of the research using the NNNS.Journal of child and adolescent psychiatric nursing : official publication of the Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nurses, Inc · 2013
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yingying XuGeneral and Community Pediatrics Research, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, ML 7035, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039, USA.
Kimberly Yolton
Jane Khoury

Funding

Study of Prevalent Neurotoxicants in ChildrenP01ES011261 · NIEHS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI LANPHEAR, BRUCE P · 2001 to 2006
$6.4M
NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES011261NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES11261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the effect of examination time on newborn neurobehavioral examinations administered within 48 hours of delivery and to identify the earliest appropriate time for performing the assessment.

methodsWe analyzed data from neurobehavioral examinations on 324 newborns using the NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS). Trends over examination time and cumulative percentage within published normal ranges were analyzed to identify the earliest appropriate time for administering the examination. Ordinal logistic regression and multivariate regression were used for testing and defining the earliest appropriate time for administering the examination without being influenced by acute effects of labor and delivery while controlling for several potential confounding factors.

resultsThe arousal, excitability, lethargy, quality-of-movement, hypotonicity, and nonoptimal-reflexes scales were sensitive to timing of the examination. Results of ordinal logistic regression showed that 20 hours after delivery seemed to be the earliest appropriate time for administering newborn NNNS examinations. The proportion of NNNS scores within the normal range increased with time significantly when the examination was made less than 20 hours after delivery (n = 148) (odds ratio: 1.12 [95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.23]), but there was no longer significant association with time of examination after 20 hours (n = 176) (odds ratio: 1.04 [95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.09]). This result was confirmed by multivariate regression.

conclusionsWe recommend 20 hours after delivery as the earliest appropriate time for administering newborn NNNS examinations to obtain results reflecting outcomes that are a representative assessment of newborn neurobehavior and not contaminated by acute effects of labor and delivery.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques, NeurologicalInfant BehaviorFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleNeonatal ScreeningProspective StudiesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID21172999
PMCPMC3375468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.