ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2011
Population genomics of transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
105 citing papers in PubMed.
- Updated Transposable Element Libraries forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Comparative genomic analysis and epigenetic profiling of the Drosophila melanogaster B chromosome.Genetics · 2026Article
- Structural variants are enriched in deleterious visible phenotypes inGenome research · 2026Article
- Manual validation finds ultra-long-read sequencing best enables faithful, population-level structural variant calling in Drosophila melanogaster euchromatin with nanopore.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Meiotic double-strand DNA breaks and spontaneous mutation in Drosophila melanogaster.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Article
- Structural and Evolutionary Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- The impact of insertion bias into piRNA clusters on the invasion of transposable elements.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Purifying selection shapes the dynamics of P-element invasion in Drosophila simulans populations.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Temporal and spatial niche partitioning in a retrotransposon community of the Drosophila melanogaster genome.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Repeat competition and ecological shifts drive the evolution of the mobilome in Rhynchospora Vahl (Cyperaceae), the holocentric beaksedges.Annals of botany · 2025Article
- DNA gains and losses in gigantic genomes do not track differences in transposable element-host silencing interactions.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Pathogen infection alters the gene expression landscape of transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- DNA Transposons Favor De Novo Transcript Emergence Through Enrichment of Transcription Factor Binding Motifs.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- The genomic distribution of transposable elements is driven by spatially variable purifying selection.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- The fine-scale recombination rate variation and associations with genomic features in a butterfly.Genome research · 2023Article
- Off-target piRNA gene silencing in Drosophila melanogaster rescued by a transposable element insertion.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Species-specific chromatin landscape determines how transposable elements shape genome evolution.eLife · 2022Article
- The Transposition Rate Has Little Influence on the Plateauing Level of the P-element.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Zebrafish transposable elements show extensive diversification in age, genomic distribution, and developmental expression.Genome research · 2022Article
45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transposable elements (TEs) are the primary contributors to the genome bulk in many organisms and are major players in genome evolution. A clear and thorough understanding of the population dynamics of TEs is therefore essential for full comprehension of the eukaryotic genome evolution and function. Although TEs in Drosophila melanogaster have received much attention, population dynamics of most TE families in this species remains entirely unexplored. It is not clear whether the same population processes can account for the population behaviors of all TEs in Drosophila or whether, as has been suggested previously, different orders behave according to very different rules. In this work, we analyzed population frequencies for a large number of individual TEs (755 TEs) in five North American and one sub-Saharan African D. melanogaster populations (75 strains in total). These TEs have been annotated in the reference D. melanogaster euchromatic genome and have been sampled from all three major orders (non-LTR, LTR, and TIR) and from all families with more than 20 TE copies (55 families in total). We find strong evidence that TEs in Drosophila across all orders and families are subject to purifying selection at the level of ectopic recombination. We showed that strength of this selection varies predictably with recombination rate, length of individual TEs, and copy number and length of other TEs in the same family. Importantly, these rules do not appear to vary across orders. Finally, we built a statistical model that considered only individual TE-level (such as the TE length) and family-level properties (such as the copy number) and were able to explain more than 40% of the variation in TE frequencies in D. melanogaster.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.