Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21172826›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2011

Population genomics of transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster.

Dmitri A Petrov, Anna-Sophie Fiston-Lavier, Mikhail Lipatov, Kapa Lenkov, Josefa González

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Updated Transposable Element Libraries forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Structural and Evolutionary Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dmitri A PetrovDepartment of Biology, Stanford University.
Anna-Sophie Fiston-Lavier
Mikhail Lipatov
Kapa Lenkov
Josefa González

Funding

Patterns of background nucleotide substitution in the human lineageR01GM077368 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PETROV, DMITRI · 2006 to 2010
$989k
Population Genomics of Adaptive Transposition in DrosophilaR01GM089926 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PETROV, DMITRI · 2010 to 2013
$969k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 077368NIGMS NIH HHS GM089926NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077368NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transposable elements (TEs) are the primary contributors to the genome bulk in many organisms and are major players in genome evolution. A clear and thorough understanding of the population dynamics of TEs is therefore essential for full comprehension of the eukaryotic genome evolution and function. Although TEs in Drosophila melanogaster have received much attention, population dynamics of most TE families in this species remains entirely unexplored. It is not clear whether the same population processes can account for the population behaviors of all TEs in Drosophila or whether, as has been suggested previously, different orders behave according to very different rules. In this work, we analyzed population frequencies for a large number of individual TEs (755 TEs) in five North American and one sub-Saharan African D. melanogaster populations (75 strains in total). These TEs have been annotated in the reference D. melanogaster euchromatic genome and have been sampled from all three major orders (non-LTR, LTR, and TIR) and from all families with more than 20 TE copies (55 families in total). We find strong evidence that TEs in Drosophila across all orders and families are subject to purifying selection at the level of ectopic recombination. We showed that strength of this selection varies predictably with recombination rate, length of individual TEs, and copy number and length of other TEs in the same family. Importantly, these rules do not appear to vary across orders. Finally, we built a statistical model that considered only individual TE-level (such as the TE length) and family-level properties (such as the copy number) and were able to explain more than 40% of the variation in TE frequencies in D. melanogaster.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophila melanogasterGene ExpressionGene FrequencyMetagenomicsModels, GeneticRecombination, GeneticSelection, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNATerminal Repeat SequencesDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID21172826
PMCPMC3080135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.