ArticleCancer2010
Stage of breast cancer at diagnosis among low-income women with access to mammography.
Article in Cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cancer Patterns and Barriers to Care Among Socioeconomically Vulnerable Populations in Tripoli: A Descriptive Study from a Local NGO.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mobile Mammography Services and Underserved Women.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Economic burden and treatment patterns of gynecologic cancers in the United States: evidence from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2007-2014.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2020Article
- Implementation Science Workshop: Barriers and Facilitators to Increasing Mammography Screening Rates in California's Public Hospitals.Journal of general internal medicine · 2017Review
- Disparities in Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis: Importance of Race, Poverty, and Age.Journal of health disparities research and practice · 2017Article
- Comparing Breast Cancer Outcomes Between Medicaid and the Ohio Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.Journal of oncology practice · 2015Article
- Breast cancer stage, surgery, and survival statistics for Idaho's National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program population, 2004-2012.Preventing chronic disease · 2015Article
- Mind the gap: racial differences in breast cancer incidence and biologic phenotype, but not stage, among low-income women participating in a government-funded screening program.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2013Article
- Patient navigation for underserved patients diagnosed with breast cancer.The oncologist · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study assessed the relationship between area-level poverty and stage of breast cancer at diagnosis among low-income women when screening mammography was available at no cost.
methodsThe authors identified women diagnosed with breast cancer from 1999 to 2005 through the Massachusetts Cancer Registry, and compared the odds of advanced stage disease for women with low incomes (n=546) for whom screening mammography and diagnostic services were available at no cost through the Massachusetts Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, relative to a nonparticipating comparison group (n=1287) residing in the same neighborhoods with similar distribution of age, race, and ethnicity as Massachusetts Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program participants. Among Massachusetts Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program participants, the odds of advanced stage disease were estimated by mammography use.
resultsAlthough screening mammography was available at no cost, only 36% of program participants diagnosed with breast cancer used screening mammography. Stage of breast cancer at diagnosis was not associated with area-level poverty among Massachusetts Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program participants. For the comparison group, advanced stage disease was more likely for residents in high-poverty areas, relative to low-poverty areas (49% vs 37%, P<.01). The adjusted odds of advanced stage disease at diagnosis was greater for women aged 41 to 49 years, compared with those aged 50 to 64 years (P=.01).
conclusionsPrograms that ensure breast cancer screening and diagnostic services are available at no cost to low-income women can mitigate the adverse effect of area-level poverty on stage of breast cancer. However, such programs require effective strategies to encourage use of screening mammography to promote diagnosis at an earlier stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.