ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part A2011
2010 Panel on the biomaterials grand challenges.
Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Facile and Versatile Technique for Creating Antifibrotic Coatings on Biomedical Implants.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The paradigm shifts of periodontal regeneration strategy: From reparative manipulation to developmental engineering.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Antifouling Immunomodulatory Copolymer Architectures That Inhibit the Fibrosis of Implants.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Engineering of an Osteoinductive and Growth Factor-Free Injectable Bone-Like Microgel for Bone Regeneration.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023Article
- Biodegradable Polyphosphazenes for Regenerative Engineering.Journal of materials research · 2022Article
- Biodegradable Polyphosphazene-Based Blends for Regenerative Engineering.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2017Article
- Engineered stem cell niche matrices for rotator cuff tendon regenerative engineering.PloS one · 2017Article
- The Quest toward limb regeneration: a regenerative engineering approach.Regenerative biomaterials · 2016Review
- REGENERATIVE ENGINEERING: APPROACHES TO LIMB REGENERATION AND OTHER GRAND CHALLENGES.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2015Article
- Rapid and extensive collapse from electrically responsive macroporous hydrogels.Advanced healthcare materials · 2014Article
- Biomechanics of the sensor-tissue interface-effects of motion, pressure, and design on sensor performance and the foreign body response-part I: theoretical framework.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2011Review
- Short-term and long-term effects of orthopedic biodegradable implants.Journal of long-term effects of medical implants · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In 2009, the National Academy for Engineering issued the Grand Challenges for Engineering in the 21st Century comprised of 14 technical challenges that must be addressed to build a healthy, profitable, sustainable, and secure global community (http://www.engineeringchallenges.org). Although crucial, none of the NEA Grand Challenges adequately addressed the challenges that face the biomaterials community. In response to the NAE Grand Challenges, Monty Reichert of Duke University organized a panel entitled Grand Challenges in Biomaterials at the at the 2010 Society for Biomaterials Annual Meeting in Seattle. Six members of the National Academies-Buddy Ratner, James Anderson, Allan Hoffman, Art Coury, Cato Laurencin, and David Tirrell-were asked to propose a grand challenge to the audience that, if met, would significantly impact the future of biomaterials and medical devices. Successfully meeting these challenges will speed the 60-plus year transition from commodity, off-the-shelf biomaterials to bioengineered chemistries, and biomaterial devices that will significantly advance our ability to address patient needs and also to create new market opportunities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.