Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21170901›Full record

ArticleCancer2011

Expanding colorectal cancer screening among minority women.

Moshe Shike, Mark Schattner, Alvaro Genao, Winsome Grant, Margaret Burke, Ann Zauber, Lianne Russo, Valerie Cuyjet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Moshe ShikeDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. New York, New York 10065, USA. Shikem@mskcc.org
Mark Schattner
Alvaro Genao
Winsome Grant
Margaret Burke
Ann Zauber
Lianne Russo
Valerie Cuyjet
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USRalph Lauren Center for Cancer Care and Prevention · USYork General Hospital · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Increasing Screening Colonoscopy Among Minority WomenR21CA100587 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SHIKE, MOSHE · 2003 to 2004
$336k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R21 CA100587
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer screening (CRCS) in the United States is inadequate in minority communities and particularly among those who lack insurance. Finding ways to increase screenings in these minorities presents a healthcare challenge. The authors sought to determine whether offering CRCS at the time of mammography is an effective way to increase CRCS among minority women.

methodsThis study was offered to women attending the Breast Examination Center of Harlem (BECH), a community outreach program of Memorial Sloan-Kettering serving the primarily black and Hispanic Harlem Community. Screening was explained, medical fitness was determined, and colonoscopies were performed. Barriers to screening and ways to overcome them were ascertained. Participants had to be at least 50 years of age without a history of colorectal cancer or screening within the last 10 years.

resultsThere were 2616 women eligible for CRCS, of these women 2005 (77%) refused to participate in the study, and 611 (23%) women were enrolled. There was a high interest in CRCS including among those who declined to participate in the study. The major barrier was lack of medical insurance, which was partially overcome by alternative funding. Of the 611 women enrolled, 337 (55%) went on to have screening colonoscopy. Forty-nine (15%) women had adenomatous polyps.

conclusionsOffering CRCS to minority women at the time of mammography and without a physician's referral is an effective way to expand screening. Screening colonoscopy findings are similar to those in the general population. Alternatives to traditional medical insurance are needed for the uninsured.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyEarly Detection of CancerMinority GroupsAgedAttitude to HealthBlack or African AmericanColonic PolypsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansInsurance, Major MedicalMammographyMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID21170901
PMCPMC3782747
OpenAlexW2024507570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.