ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2011
Neural adaptation facilitates oscillatory responses to static inputs in a recurrent network of ON and OFF cells.
Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Shaping Intrinsic Neural Oscillations with Periodic Stimulation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigate the role of adaptation in a neural field model, composed of ON and OFF cells, with delayed all-to-all recurrent connections. As external spatially profiled inputs drive the network, ON cells receive inputs directly, while OFF cells receive an inverted image of the original signals. Via global and delayed inhibitory connections, these signals can cause the system to enter states of sustained oscillatory activity. We perform a bifurcation analysis of our model to elucidate how neural adaptation influences the ability of the network to exhibit oscillatory activity. We show that slow adaptation encourages input-induced rhythmic states by decreasing the Andronov-Hopf bifurcation threshold. We further determine how the feedback and adaptation together shape the resonant properties of the ON and OFF cell network and how this affects the response to time-periodic input. By introducing an additional frequency in the system, adaptation alters the resonance frequency by shifting the peaks where the response is maximal. We support these results with numerical experiments of the neural field model. Although developed in the context of the circuitry of the electric sense, these results are applicable to any network of spontaneously firing cells with global inhibitory feedback to themselves, in which a fraction of these cells receive external input directly, while the remaining ones receive an inverted version of this input via feedforward di-synaptic inhibition. Thus the results are relevant beyond the many sensory systems where ON and OFF cells are usually identified, and provide the backbone for understanding dynamical network effects of lateral connections and various forms of ON/OFF responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.