Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21170359›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2010

The C-terminal domain of the bacterial SSB protein acts as a DNA maintenance hub at active chromosome replication forks.

Audrey Costes, François Lecointe, Stephen McGovern, Sophie Quevillon-Cheruel, Patrice Polard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Development of a new recombineering system forSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2027
    Article
  2. Utilizing natural competence to genetically manipulateApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. DNA polymerase I: structure, activity, and function in bacterial DNA replication and repair.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. "ThebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The RecBC complex protects single-stranded DNA gaps during lesion bypass.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Audrey CostesLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires, Université de Toulouse, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, LMGM-UMR5100, Toulouse, France.
François Lecointe
Stephen McGovern
Sophie Quevillon-Cheruel
Patrice Polard
Microbiologie de l’alimentation au service de la santé · FRInstitut de Biochimie et Biophysique Moléculaire et Cellulaire · FRLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires · FRUniversité de Toulouse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have investigated in vivo the role of the carboxy-terminal domain of the Bacillus subtilis Single-Stranded DNA Binding protein (SSB(Cter)) as a recruitment platform at active chromosomal forks for many proteins of the genome maintenance machineries. We probed this SSB(Cter) interactome using GFP fusions and by Tap-tag and biochemical analysis. It includes at least 12 proteins. The interactome was previously shown to include PriA, RecG, and RecQ and extended in this study by addition of DnaE, SbcC, RarA, RecJ, RecO, XseA, Ung, YpbB, and YrrC. Targeting of YpbB to active forks appears to depend on RecS, a RecQ paralogue, with which it forms a stable complex. Most of these SSB partners are conserved in bacteria, while others, such as the essential DNA polymerase DnaE, YrrC, and the YpbB/RecS complex, appear to be specific to B. subtilis. SSB(Cter) deletion has a moderate impact on B. subtilis cell growth. However, it markedly affects the efficiency of repair of damaged genomic DNA and arrested replication forks. ssbΔCter mutant cells appear deficient in RecA loading on ssDNA, explaining their inefficiency in triggering the SOS response upon exposure to genotoxic agents. Together, our findings show that the bacterial SSB(Cter) acts as a DNA maintenance hub at active chromosomal forks that secures their propagation along the genome.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationBacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsChromosomes, BacterialDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, Single-StrandedProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, Single-Stranded

Identifiers

PMID21170359
PMCPMC3000357
OpenAlexW1975853779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.