Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21170352›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2010

Endostar-loaded PEG-PLGA nanoparticles: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.

Sanyuan Hu, Yangde Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Histochemistry for Molecular Imaging in Nanomedicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Theranostics Aspects of Various Nanoparticles in Veterinary Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Nanotechnology-based approaches in anticancer research.International journal of nanomedicine · 2012
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sanyuan HuXiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, People's Republic of China.
Yangde Zhang
Central South University · CN

Funding

Sex differences in stress-alcohol interactions modulating amygdala activityR00AA021802 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI LOGRIP, MARIAN LEE · 2015 to 2017
$747k
Sex differences in stress-alcohol interactions modulating amygdala activityK99AA021802 · NIAAA · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI LOGRIP, MARIAN LEE · 2013 to 2014
$279k
NIAAA NIH HHS K99 AA021802NIAAA NIH HHS R00 AA021802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endostar, a novel recombinant human endostatin, which was approved by the Chinese State Food and Drug Administration in 2005, has a broad spectrum of activity against solid tumors. In this study, we aimed to determine whether the anticancer effect of Endostar is increased by using a nanocarrier system. It is expected that the prolonged circulation of endostar will improve its anticancer activity. Endostar-loaded nanoparticles were prepared to improve controlled release of the drug in mice and rabbits, as well as its anticancer effects in mice with colon cancer. A protein release system could be exploited to act as a drug carrier. Nanoparticles were formulated from poly (ethylene glycol) modified poly (DL-lactide-co-glycolide) (PEG-PLGA) by a double emulsion technique. Physical and release characteristics of endostar-loaded nanoparticles in vitro were evaluated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS), and micro bicinchoninic acid protein assay. The pharmacokinetic parameters of endostar nanoparticles in rabbit and mice plasma were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Western blot was used to detect endostatin in different tissues. To study the effects of endostar-loaded nanoparticles in vivo, nude mice in which tumor cells HT-29 were implanted, were subsequently treated with endostar or endostar-loaded PEG-PLGA nanoparticles. Using TEM and PCS, endostar-loaded PEG-PLGA nanoparticles were found to have a spherical core-shell structure with a diameter of 169.56 ± 35.03 nm. Drug-loading capacity was 8.22% ± 2.35% and drug encapsulation was 80.17% ± 7.83%. Compared with endostar, endostar-loaded PEG-PLGA nanoparticles had a longer elimination half-life and lower peak concentration, caused slower growth of tumor cell xenografts, and prolonged tumor doubling times. The nanoparticles changed the pharmacokinetic characteristics of endostar in mice and rabbits, thereby reinforcing anticancer activity. In conclusion, PEG-PLGA nanoparticles are a feasible carrier for endostar. Endostar-loaded PEG-PLGA nanoparticles seem to have a better anticancer effect than conventional endostar. We believe that PEG-PLGA nanoparticles are an effective carrier for protein medicines.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsCell ProliferationEndostatinsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHT29 CellsHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, NudeMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionNanoparticlesNeoplasmsendostar proteinEndostatinsPolyethylene GlycolsPolyglactin 910poly(lactic-glycolic acid)-poly(ethyleneglycol) copolymerRecombinant Proteinsbiologic physicsmedical physicsnanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID21170352
PMCPMC3000203
OpenAlexW2051359139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.