ArticleNonlinear dynamics2010
Minimal formulation of joint motion for biomechanisms.
Article in Nonlinear dynamics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2015Guideline
- A Tightly Coupled Multibody Dynamics and Multi-Sensor Fusion Algorithm for Simultaneous Kinematics and Kinetics Estimation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- A Shoulder Musculoskeletal Model with Three-Dimensional Complex Muscle Geometries.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Comparison of biomechanical analysis results using different musculoskeletal models for children with cerebral palsy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Cortical and subcortical areas involved in the regulation of reach movement speed in the human brain: An fMRI study.Human brain mapping · 2019Article
- On the coordination of highly dynamic human movements: an extension of the Uncontrolled Manifold approach applied to precision jump in parkour.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- OpenSim: Simulating musculoskeletal dynamics and neuromuscular control to study human and animal movement.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Bioinspired Technologies to Connect Musculoskeletal Mechanobiology to the Person for Training and Rehabilitation.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2017Review
- An Open-Source Toolbox for Surrogate Modeling of Joint Contact Mechanics.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2016Article
- A Biomechanical Model of the Scapulothoracic Joint to Accurately Capture Scapular Kinematics during Shoulder Movements.PloS one · 2016Article
- WHAT IS A MOMENT ARM? CALCULATING MUSCLE EFFECTIVENESS IN BIOMECHANICAL MODELS USING GENERALIZED COORDINATES.Proceedings of the ... ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences · 2013Article
- Compressive tibiofemoral force during crouch gait.Gait & posture · 2012Article
- Muscle contributions to propulsion and support during running.Journal of biomechanics · 2010Article
- Simbody: multibody dynamics for biomedical research.Procedia IUTAMArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomechanical systems share many properties with mechanically engineered systems, and researchers have successfully employed mechanical engineering simulation software to investigate the mechanical behavior of diverse biological mechanisms, ranging from biomolecules to human joints. Unlike their man-made counterparts, however, biomechanisms rarely exhibit the simple, uncoupled, pure-axial motion that is engineered into mechanical joints such as sliders, pins, and ball-and-socket joints. Current mechanical modeling software based on internal-coordinate multibody dynamics can formulate engineered joints directly in minimal coordinates, but requires additional coordinates restricted by constraints to model more complex motions. This approach can be inefficient, inaccurate, and difficult for biomechanists to customize. Since complex motion is the rule rather than the exception in biomechanisms, the benefits of minimal coordinate modeling are not fully realized in biomedical research. Here we introduce a practical implementation for empirically-defined internal-coordinate joints, which we call "mobilizers." A mobilizer encapsulates the observations, measurement frame, and modeling requirements into a hinge specification of the permissible-motion manifold for a minimal set of internal coordinates. Mobilizers support nonlinear mappings that are mathematically equivalent to constraint manifolds but have the advantages of fewer coordinates, no constraints, and exact representation of the biomechanical motion-space-the benefits long enjoyed for internal-coordinate models of mechanical joints. Hinge matrices within the mobilizer are easily specified by user-supplied functions, and provide a direct means of mapping permissible motion derived from empirical data. We present computational results showing substantial performance and accuracy gains for mobilizers versus equivalent joints implemented with constraints. Examples of mobilizers for joints from human biomechanics and molecular dynamics are given. All methods and examples were implemented in Simbody™-an open source multibody-dynamics solver available at https://Simtk.org.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.