Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21170093›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2011

BU- vs TBI-based conditioning for adult patients with ALL.

M Kalaycio, B Bolwell, L Rybicki, A Absi, S Andresen, B Pohlman, R Dean, R Sobecks, E Copelan

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M KalaycioDepartment of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44196, USA. kalaycm@ccf.org
B Bolwell
L Rybicki
A Absi
S Andresen
B Pohlman
R Dean
R Sobecks
E Copelan
Cleveland Clinic · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USKing Khaled Hospital · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence suggests an advantage for TBI over BU as a component of conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant in patients with ALL. We have employed both TBI and BU for conditioning in ALL and reviewed our experience to compare outcomes. From July 1989 to June 2008, we identified 86-adult ALL patients treated with either a TBI- or BU-based regimen and transplanted with either a well-matched sibling or unrelated donor. Data including demographics, immunophenotype, disease status and cytogenetic risk were examined by Cox proportional hazards analysis. Patients treated with TBI were older (median age 40 vs 33 years; P=0.018), had a higher-risk cytogenetic profile (P=0.010), were more often transplanted using an unrelated donor (P=0.038) and were treated more recently (P<0.001). There was a significant improvement in EFS (P=0.046), and a trend to improved OS (P=0.08) in patients treated with TBI compared with those treated with BU. However, the advantage for TBI could not be confirmed by multivariable analysis where only disease status retained statistical significance.

Indexed as

Whole-Body IrradiationAdultBusulfanFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaTransplantation ConditioningUnrelated DonorsBusulfan

Identifiers

PMID21170093
OpenAlexW2080130915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.