ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2010
How common is tooth pain after root canal treatment?
Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
data sourcesMedline, the Cochrane Library, TRIP database and Google Scholar, hand searching of articles, reviews and textbooks. STUDY SELECTION: Articles in any language about endodontic procedures, (initial treatment or retreatment and surgical or nonsurgical but not pulpotomy, partial pulpectomy or pulp capping) in permanent teeth that reported on pain at a minimum of six months were included. The main outcome was the presence of all-cause pain, with no differentiation on the basis of aetiologies. The outcome of all-cause pain was considered positive if reported by either the patient or the practitioner. Pain could be spontaneous or provoked by biting, palpation or percussion. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were extracted independently by two reviewers and STROBE criteria (www.strobe-statement.org) used to assess quality. A summary estimate of persistent all-cause pain frequency was established by using a random-effects meta-analysis. The influence of treatment approach (surgical/nonsurgical), longitudinal study design (prospective/retrospective), follow-up rate and duration, initial treatment versus retreatment, and quality of reporting on the pain frequency estimate was assessed in subgroup analyses.
results26 studies that included 5777 teeth with 2996 (51.9%) having follow-up pain information met the inclusion criteria. 168 teeth with pain were identified giving a frequency of 5.3% (95% confidence interval, 3.5%-7.2%, p < 0.001) for persistent all-cause pain. High and statistically significant heterogeneity among studies (I(2) = 80%) was present. In subgroup analysis, prospective studies had a higher pain frequency (7.6%) than retrospectives studies (0.9%). Quality of study reporting was identified as the most influential reason for study heterogeneity.
conclusionsThe frequency of all-cause persistent pain after endodontic procedures was estimated to be 5.3%, with higher report quality studies suggesting >7%.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.