Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21169375›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2011

Adjustment for local ancestry in genetic association analysis of admixed populations.

Xuexia Wang, Xiaofeng Zhu, Huaizhen Qin, Richard S Cooper, Warren J Ewens, Chun Li, Mingyao Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Strategies for the Genomic Analysis of Admixed Populations.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xuexia WangDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Xiaofeng Zhu
Huaizhen Qin
Richard S Cooper
Warren J Ewens
Chun Li
Mingyao Li

Funding

Statistical methods for analyzing high-throughput genotype dataR01HG003054 · NHGRI · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI ZHU, XIAOFENG · 2005 to 2017
$3.6M
Defining an Obesity QTL on Chromosome 3qR01HL074166 · NHLBI · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI ZHU, XIAOFENG · 2004 to 2007
$2.9M
Developing Statistical Methods for Disease Gene DiscoveryR01HG004517 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LI, CHUN, LI, MINGYAO · 2008 to 2012
$1.9M
Statistical Methods for Gene Mapping Studies in Admixed PopulationsR01HG005854 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LI, MINGYAO · 2010 to 2012
$978k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003054NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004517NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG004517NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005854NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG005854NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL074166NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL074166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationAdmixed populations offer a unique opportunity for mapping diseases that have large disease allele frequency differences between ancestral populations. However, association analysis in such populations is challenging because population stratification may lead to association with loci unlinked to the disease locus. METHODS AND

resultsWe show that local ancestry at a test single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) may confound with the association signal and ignoring it can lead to spurious association. We demonstrate theoretically that adjustment for local ancestry at the test SNP is sufficient to remove the spurious association regardless of the mechanism of population stratification, whether due to local or global ancestry differences among study subjects; however, global ancestry adjustment procedures may not be effective. We further develop two novel association tests that adjust for local ancestry. Our first test is based on a conditional likelihood framework which models the distribution of the test SNP given disease status and flanking marker genotypes. A key advantage of this test lies in its ability to incorporate different directions of association in the ancestral populations. Our second test, which is computationally simpler, is based on logistic regression, with adjustment for local ancestry proportion. We conducted extensive simulations and found that the Type I error rates of our tests are under control; however, the global adjustment procedures yielded inflated Type I error rates when stratification is due to local ancestry difference.

Indexed as

Gene FrequencyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideComputer SimulationGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetics, PopulationGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHumansLikelihood FunctionsLogistic Models

Identifiers

PMID21169375
PMCPMC3042179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.