Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21169177›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2010

Theme issue on e-mental health: a growing field in internet research.

Heleen Riper, Gerhard Andersson, Helen Christensen, Pim Cuijpers, Alfred Lange, Gunther Eysenbach

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 91 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04830527 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Development and Evaluation of an Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) Baseline Screening System for Therapists Who Treat Youths With Depressive Symptoms

TypeinterventionalSponsorVania Martínez-NahuelRan2020 to 2021Enrolled60ConditionsDepressive SymptomsArmsEMA prompting for patients, PDF Reports for therapists
NCT05633186 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Sustainable Upscaling of Depression Prevention, Finding the Optimal Balance Between Investment and Benefit (SPRINT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorVU University of AmsterdamRan2022 to 2023Enrolled307ConditionsDepressionArmsMoodbuster Life, Mobile application, Guidance by a coach, Motivational Content
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Technologies Applied to the Mental Health Care of Pregnant Women: A Systematic Literature Review.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Heleen Riper
Gerhard Andersson
Helen Christensen
Pim Cuijpers
Alfred Lange
Gunther Eysenbach

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This theme issue on e-mental health presents 16 articles from leading researchers working on systems and theories related to supporting and improving mental health conditions and mental health care using information and communication technologies. In this editorial, we present the background of this theme issue, and highlight the content of this issue.

Indexed as

Computer User TrainingHumansInternetMental DisordersMental Health ServicesRemote ConsultationResearch DesignTherapy, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID21169177
PMCPMC3057318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.