Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21168518›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2011

Opposing patterns of neural priming in same-exemplar vs. different-exemplar repetition predict subsequent memory.

Anna Manelis, Mark E Wheeler, Christopher A Paynter, Lisa Storey, Lynne M Reder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna ManelisDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Mark E Wheeler
Christopher A Paynter
Lisa Storey
Lynne M Reder

Funding

Predoctoral Training Program in Behavioral Brain ResearchT32GM081760 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FIEZ, JULIE A, HOLT, LORI L · 2007 to 2021
$4.3M
COMPUTATIONAL &BEHAVIORAL APPROACHES TO COGNITIONT32MH019983 · NIMH · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI REDER, LYNNE MARIE · 1998 to 2012
$2.6M
EXPLORING THE SAC MODEL OF MEMORYR01MH052808 · NIMH · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI REDER, LYNNE MARIE · 1996 to 2008
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM081760NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM081760NIMH NIH HHS 5R01MH052808NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH052808NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019983NIMH NIH HHS T32MH019983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present neuroimaging study examines how repetition-related neural attenuation effects differ as a function of the perceptual similarity of the repetition and subsequent memory. One previous study (Turk-Browne et al., 2006) reported greater attenuation effects for subsequent hits than for misses. Another study (Wagner et al., 2000) found that neural attenuation is negatively correlated with subsequent memory. These opposing results suggest that repetition-related neural attenuation for subsequent hits and misses may be driven by different factors. In order to investigate the factors that affect the degree of neural attenuation, we varied perceptual similarity between repetitions in a scanned encoding phase that was followed by a subsequent memory test outside the scanner. We demonstrated that the degree of neural attenuation in the object processing regions depends on the interaction between perceptual similarity across repeated presentations and the quality their encodings. Specifically, the same areas that decreased neural signal for repetitions of same exemplars that were subsequently recognized with confidence that the repetitions were identical showed a decrease in neural signal for different-exemplar misses but not for the corresponding subsequently recognized hits. Our results imply that repetition-related neural attenuation should be related to the more efficient processing of perceptual properties of the stimuli only if subjects are able to subsequently remember the stimuli. Otherwise, the cause of attenuation may be in the failure to encode the stimuli on the second presentation as shown by the pattern of neural attenuation for the different-exemplar misses.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAdultBrainFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemoryPhotic StimulationRecognition, PsychologyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21168518
PMCPMC3035747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.