ArticleInternational journal of health geographics2010
Gumbel based p-value approximations for spatial scan statistics.
Article in International journal of health geographics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Alcohol consumption: context and association with mortality in Switzerland.European journal of nutrition · 2023Article
- Is Following a Cancer-Protective Lifestyle Linked to Reduced Cancer Mortality Risk?International journal of public health · 2023Article
- Spatio-temporal epidemiology of the tuberculosis incidence rate in Iran 2008 to 2018.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Evaluation of the Gini Coefficient in Spatial Scan Statistics for Detecting Irregularly Shaped Clusters.PloS one · 2017Article
- Using Gini coefficient to determining optimal cluster reporting sizes for spatial scan statistics.International journal of health geographics · 2016Article
- Article
- Geographical Clusters of Rape in the United States: 2000-2012.Statistics and public policy (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2015Article
- Maximum linkage space-time permutation scan statistics for disease outbreak detection.International journal of health geographics · 2014Article
- Applying spatial analysis tools in public health: an example using SaTScan to detect geographic targets for colorectal cancer screening interventions.Preventing chronic disease · 2014Article
- Event detection using Twitter: a spatio-temporal approach.PloS one · 2014Article
- Clusters of adolescent and young adult thyroid cancer in Florida counties.BioMed research international · 2014Article
- Local multiplicity adjustment for the spatial scan statistic using the Gumbel distribution.Biometrics · 2012Article
- Data-driven inference for the spatial scan statistic.International journal of health geographics · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe spatial and space-time scan statistics are commonly applied for the detection of geographical disease clusters. Monte Carlo hypothesis testing is typically used to test whether the geographical clusters are statistically significant as there is no known way to calculate the null distribution analytically. In Monte Carlo hypothesis testing, simulated random data are generated multiple times under the null hypothesis, and the p-value is r/(R + 1), where R is the number of simulated random replicates of the data and r is the rank of the test statistic from the real data compared to the same test statistics calculated from each of the random data sets. A drawback to this powerful technique is that each additional digit of p-value precision requires ten times as many replicated datasets, and the additional processing can lead to excessive run times.
resultsWe propose a new method for obtaining more precise p-values with a given number of replicates. The collection of test statistics from the random replicates is used to estimate the true distribution of the test statistic under the null hypothesis by fitting a continuous distribution to these observations. The choice of distribution is critical, and for the spatial and space-time scan statistics, the extreme value Gumbel distribution performs very well while the gamma, normal and lognormal distributions perform poorly. From the fitted Gumbel distribution, we show that it is possible to estimate the analytical p-value with great precision even when the test statistic is far out in the tail beyond any of the test statistics observed in the simulated replicates. In addition, Gumbel-based rejection probabilities have smaller variability than Monte Carlo-based rejection probabilities, suggesting that the proposed approach may result in greater power than the true Monte Carlo hypothesis test for a given number of replicates.
conclusionsFor large data sets, it is often advantageous to replace computer intensive Monte Carlo hypothesis testing with this new method of fitting a Gumbel distribution to random data sets generated under the null, in order to reduce computation time and obtain much more precise p-values and slightly higher statistical power.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.