Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21167036›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2010

Inference of hierarchical regulatory network of estrogen-dependent breast cancer through ChIP-based data.

Fei Gu, Hang-Kai Hsu, Pei-Yin Hsu, Jiejun Wu, Yilin Ma, Jeffrey Parvin, Tim H-M Huang, Victor X Jin

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fei GuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.
Hang-Kai Hsu
Pei-Yin Hsu
Jiejun Wu
Yilin Ma
Jeffrey Parvin
Tim H-M Huang
Victor X Jin
The Ohio State University · USCancer Genetics (United States) · US

Funding

Predicting Drug Resistance in Cancer Genomes by DMA Methylation ProfilingU54CA113001 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI HUANG, TIM H.-M. · 2004 to 2014
$16.1M
DNA Hypermethylation in Breast CancerR01CA069065 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI HUANG, TIM H.-M. · 2002 to 2011
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01CA069065NCI NIH HHS U54CA113001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobal profiling of in vivo protein-DNA interactions using ChIP-based technologies has evolved rapidly in recent years. Although many genome-wide studies have identified thousands of ERα binding sites and have revealed the associated transcription factor (TF) partners, such as AP1, FOXA1 and CEBP, little is known about ERα associated hierarchical transcriptional regulatory networks.

resultsIn this study, we applied computational approaches to analyze three public available ChIP-based datasets: ChIP-seq, ChIP-PET and ChIP-chip, and to investigate the hierarchical regulatory network for ERα and ERα partner TFs regulation in estrogen-dependent breast cancer MCF7 cells. 16 common TFs and two common new TF partners (RORA and PITX2) were found among ChIP-seq, ChIP-chip and ChIP-PET datasets. The regulatory networks were constructed by scanning the ChIP-peak region with TF specific position weight matrix (PWM). A permutation test was performed to test the reliability of each connection of the network. We then used DREM software to perform gene ontology function analysis on the common genes. We found that FOS, PITX2, RORA and FOXA1 were involved in the up-regulated genes.We also conducted the ERα and Pol-II ChIP-seq experiments in tamoxifen resistance MCF7 cells (denoted as MCF7-T in this study) and compared the difference between MCF7 and MCF7-T cells. The result showed very little overlap between these two cells in terms of targeted genes (21.2% of common genes) and targeted TFs (25% of common TFs). The significant dissimilarity may indicate totally different transcriptional regulatory mechanisms between these two cancer cells.

conclusionsOur study uncovers new estrogen-mediated regulatory networks by mining three ChIP-based data in MCF7 cells and ChIP-seq data in MCF7-T cells. We compared the different ChIP-based technologies as well as different breast cancer cells. Our computational analytical approach may guide biologists to further study the underlying mechanisms in breast cancer cells or other human diseases.

Indexed as

Chromatin ImmunoprecipitationGene Regulatory NetworksBase SequenceBinding SitesBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogensGene Expression ProfilingGenes, NeoplasmGenomicsHumansRNA Polymerase IIEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogensRNA Polymerase IITamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID21167036
PMCPMC3012048
OpenAlexW2095532403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.