Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21166792›Full record

ArticleEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2011

A case-by-case evolutionary analysis of four imprinted retrogenes.

Ruth B McCole, Noeleen B Loughran, Mandeep Chahal, Luis P Fernandes, Roland G Roberts, Franca Fraternali, Mary J O'Connell, Rebecca J Oakey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Epigenetic changes in the developing brain: Effects on behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Importance of the matriline for genomic imprinting, brain development and behaviour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ruth B McColeDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom. ruth.mccole@genetics.harvard.edu
Noeleen B Loughran
Mandeep Chahal
Luis P Fernandes
Roland G Roberts
Franca Fraternali
Mary J O'Connell
Rebecca J Oakey

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilWellcome Trust 085448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retroposition is a widespread phenomenon resulting in the generation of new genes that are initially related to a parent gene via very high coding sequence similarity. We examine the evolutionary fate of four retrogenes generated by such an event; mouse Inpp5f_v2, Mcts2, Nap1l5, and U2af1-rs1. These genes are all subject to the epigenetic phenomenon of parental imprinting. We first provide new data on the age of these retrogene insertions. Using codon-based models of sequence evolution, we show these retrogenes have diverse evolutionary trajectories, including divergence from the parent coding sequence under positive selection pressure, purifying selection pressure maintaining parent-retrogene similarity, and neutral evolution. Examination of the expression pattern of retrogenes shows an atypical, broad pattern across multiple tissues. Protein 3D structure modeling reveals that a positively selected residue in U2af1-rs1, not shared by its parent, may influence protein conformation. Our case-by-case analysis of the evolution of four imprinted retrogenes reveals that this interesting class of imprinted genes, while similar in regulation and sequence characteristics, follow very varied evolutionary paths.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomic ImprintingAnimalsEpistasis, GeneticInositol Polyphosphate 5-PhosphatasesMiceModels, GeneticModels, StructuralMonocarboxylic Acid TransportersNerve Tissue ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPhosphoric Monoester HydrolasesPhylogenyRetroelementsRibonucleoproteinsSplicing Factor U2AFInositol Polyphosphate 5-PhosphatasesMonocarboxylic Acid TransportersNap1l5 protein, mouseNerve Tissue ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPhosphoric Monoester HydrolasesRetroelementsRibonucleoproteinsSlc16a7 protein, mouseSplicing Factor U2AFZrsr1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID21166792
PMCPMC3107425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.