Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21166469›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2011

Development of CHARMM polarizable force field for nucleic acid bases based on the classical Drude oscillator model.

Christopher M Baker, Victor M Anisimov, Alexander D MacKerell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Lessons Learned on Obtaining Reliable Dynamic Properties for Ionic Liquids.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher M BakerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, 20 Penn Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA.
Victor M Anisimov
Alexander D MacKerell

Funding

Oligonucleotide Conformational HeterogeneityR01GM051501 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI MACKERELL, ALEXANDER D · 2003 to 2018
$3.6M
HALOGEN FREE ENERGY DATABASE FOR RATIONAL DRUG DESIGNR29GM051501 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI MACKERELL, ALEXANDER D. · 1996 to 2000
$108k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM051501NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM051501NIGMS NIH HHS R29 GM051501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A polarizable force field for nucleic acid bases based on the classical Drude oscillator model is presented. Parameter optimization was performed to reproduce crystallographic geometries, crystal unit cell parameters, heats of sublimation, vibrational frequencies and assignments, dipole moments, molecular polarizabilities and quantum mechanical base-base and base-water interaction energies. The training and validation data included crystals of unsubstituted and alkyl-substituted adenine, guanine, cytosine, uracil, and thymine bases, hydrated crystals, and hydrogen bonded base pairs. Across all compounds, the RMSD in the calculated heats of sublimation is 4.1%. This equates to an improvement of more than 2.5 kcal/mol in accuracy compared to the nonpolarizable CHARMM27 force field. However, the level of agreement with experimental molecular volume decreased from 1.7% to 2.1% upon moving from the nonpolarizable to the polarizable model. The representation of dipole moments is significantly improved with the Drude polarizable force field. Unlike in additive force fields, there is no requirement for the gas-phase dipole moments to be overestimated, illustrating the ability of the Drude polarizable force field to treat accurately differently dielectric environments and indicating the improvements in the electrostatic model. Validation of the model was performed on the basis of the calculation of the gas-phase binding enthalpies of base pairs obtained via potential of mean force calculations; the additive and polarizable models both performed satisfactorily with average differences of 0.2 and 0.9 kcal/mol, respectively, and rms differences of 1.3 and 1.7 kcal/mol, respectively. Overall, considering the number of significant improvements versus the additive CHARMM force field, the incorporation of explicit polarizability into the force field for nucleic acid bases represents an additional step toward accurate computational modeling of biological systems.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalComputer SimulationGasesHydrogen BondingModels, MolecularMolecular StructureNucleic AcidsSodiumSoftwareSolventsGasesNucleic AcidsSodiumSolvents

Identifiers

PMID21166469
PMCPMC3166616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.