ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2012
Comparing the rates of mental disorders among different linguistic groups in a representative Canadian population.
Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors associated with late-life psychosis in primary care older adults without a diagnosis of dementia.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2022Article
- Unravelling the complexities of inequalities in mental healthcare and outcomes for cultural and linguistic minorities.BJPsych international · 2020Article
- Are there mental health differences between francophone and non-francophone populations in manitoba?Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to determine whether linguistic group influences reported prevalence rates for a number of common mental disorders.
methodsSecondary data analyses of the Canadian Community Health Survey cycle 1.2 (CCHS 1.2) were carried out on representative bilingual French and English, monolingual French and English and other language groups in Canada. Past year prevalence of major depression, anxiety disorders (agoraphobia, social phobia, panic disorder) and alcohol abuse/dependence were ascertained using versions of the World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI) questionnaire. Multivariate data analyses were used to model past year presence of a mental disorder as a function of linguistic group, defined as languages can converse in, and adjusting for socioeconomic, demographic and cultural factors.
resultsOverall, past year rates for the presence of a common mental disorder were 10.7% (9.7-11.7%) for the bilingual English; 9.0% (8.1-9.9%) for the bilingual French; 10.2% (9.8-10.6) for the monolingual English; 8.5% (7.7-9.3%) for the monolingual French; and 8.3% (6.1-10.4%) for the other language group. After adjusting for a number of socio-demographic, economic and cultural factors, the multivariate analyses showed that the linguistic groups were equally likely to report the presence of a past year common mental disorder. This was also true for comparisons between the bilingual participants responding in French and English.
conclusionsThe differences observed in the reported crude rates for the presence of mental disorders across the different linguistic groups in Canada were explained by socio-demographic, economic, and factors such as immigration, spoke a third language and province of residence, and not explained by language of interview.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21165596What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.