Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21165589›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2011

[Polypharmacy in schizophrenia].

M Zink, S Englisch, A Meyer-Lindenberg

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

M ZinkAbteilung fürf Psychiatrie and Psychotherapie, Zentralinstitut für seelische Gesundheit, 68072, Mannheim, Deutschland. mathias.zink@zi-mannheim.de
S Englisch
A Meyer-Lindenberg
Zentrum für Seelische Gesundheit · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile most guidelines recommend monotherapy with second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) in schizophrenia, the combined application of multiple psychotropic agents is very common, especially in treatment-refractory cases.

methodsThis review summarizes the evidence of combined antipsychotic treatment strategies and the augmentation of antipsychotics with mood stabilizers, antidepressants and experimental substances, based on publications accessible in public databases (Medline/Ovid, Google, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov) up to October 2009.

resultsPolypharmacy aims to address several aspects of treatment resistance and side effects of antipsychotics. Some evidence supports the augmentation of antipsychotics with antidepressants for negative symptoms and comorbid major depressive episodes. The add-on of lithium and mood stabilizers lacks compelling evidence but might be beneficial for specific subgroups. For treatment-resistant cognitive symptoms, cognitive re-mediation seems most promising as no pharmacological add-on strategy has gained convincing evidence so far. Acute dystonic movements should be treated with anticholinergic agents while agitation and anxiety might respond to short-term application of benzodiazepines. Treatment-resistant positive and/or negative symptoms should primarily lead to clozapine monotherapy; the add-on of a second SGA may be considered in single cases.

conclusionsIn general, rigorous data on combination therapy in schizophrenia are rare, and further randomized controlled trials (RCT), naturalistic and head-to-head-studies are necessary.

Indexed as

PolypharmacyAntidepressive AgentsAntimanic AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsHumansSchizophreniaAntidepressive AgentsAntimanic AgentsAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID21165589
OpenAlexW1574367233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.