Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21164535›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2011

Targeting bacterial membrane function: an underexploited mechanism for treating persistent infections.

Julian G Hurdle, Alex J O'Neill, Ian Chopra, Richard E Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 358 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
358citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

358 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Monocaprin, Monolaurin, and Monomyristin EradicatePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. MnOMaterials today. Bio · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

298 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julian G HurdleDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas 76019, USA. hurdle@uta.edu
Alex J O'Neill
Ian Chopra
Richard E Lee

Funding

Inhibitors of latent M. tuberculosisR01AI062415 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI LEE, RICHARD E. · 2004 to 2012
$4.1M
Targeting the PlsX/Y pathway for novel antimicrobialsR01AI079653 · NIAID · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI LEE, RICHARD E., ROCK, CHARLES O · 2009 to 2010
$1.1M
NIAID NIH HHS 1 R01AI079653NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI062415NIAID NIH HHS R01AI062415NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI079653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Persistent infections involving slow-growing or non-growing bacteria are hard to treat with antibiotics that target biosynthetic processes in growing cells. Consequently, there is a need for antimicrobials that can treat infections containing dormant bacteria. In this Review, we discuss the emerging concept that disrupting the bacterial membrane bilayer or proteins that are integral to membrane function (including membrane potential and energy metabolism) in dormant bacteria is a strategy for treating persistent infections. The clinical applicability of these approaches is exemplified by the efficacy of lipoglycopeptides that damage bacterial membranes and of the diarylquinoline TMC207, which inhibits membrane-bound ATP synthase. Despite some drawbacks, membrane-active agents form an important new means of eradicating recalcitrant, non-growing bacteria.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacterial InfectionsCell MembraneDrug Resistance, BacterialGene Expression Regulation, BacterialAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID21164535
PMCPMC3496266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.