ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2010
Comparison of the pharmacokinetic properties of vancomycin, linezolid, tigecyclin, and daptomycin.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- Updated antimicrobial dosing recommendations for obese patients.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Development of Vancomycin, a Glycopeptide Antibiotic, in a Suitable Nanoform for Oral Delivery.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Observational
- Interaction of the Atypical Tetracyclines Chelocardin and Amidochelocardin with Renal Drug Transporters.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024Article
- Population pharmacokinetic analysis for dose regimen optimization of vancomycin in Southern Chinese children.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2024Article
- Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Children with Acute Kidney Injury.Paediatric drugs · 2023Review
- Dose optimization in surgical prophylaxis: sub-inhibitory dosing of vancomycin increases rates of biofilm formation and the rates of surgical site infection.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Developmental Pharmacokinetics of Antibiotics Used in Neonatal ICU: Focus on Preterm Infants.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Tissue Penetration of Antimicrobials in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Systematic Review-Part II.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Tissue Penetration of Antimicrobials in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Systematic Review-Part I.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Factors Associated with Daptomycin-Induced Eosinophilic Pneumonia.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Digestive Decolonization of Colorectal Carriage of Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in a Japanese Adult.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2022Article
- Pharmacokinetic assessment of vancomycin in critically ill patients and nephrotoxicity prediction using individualized pharmacokinetic parameters.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Model-Informed Drug Development for Anti-Infectives: State of the Art and Future.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2021Review
- Differential effects of antibiotics on neutrophils exposed to lipoteichoic acid derived from Staphylococcus aureus.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2020Article
- Intrathecal Antibacterial and Antifungal Therapies.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020Review
- The effect of body mass index and creatinine clearance on serum trough concentration of vancomycin in adult patients.BMC infectious diseases · 2020Article
- First Report of the Local Spread of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Ascribed to the Interspecies Transmission of amSphere · 2020Article
- Time-kill curves of daptomycin and Monte Carlo simulation for the treatment of bacteraemia caused by Enterococcus faecium.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid antibiotic resistance development has created a major demand for new antimicrobial agents that can combat resistant strains such as methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Until a short time ago, the glycopeptide vancomycin was the only therapeutic choice in this situation. However, in recent years some newer agents with different mechanisms of actions have been added to the arsenal, and more are on the horizon. For a successful therapy it is of vital importance that these compounds are used judiciously and dosed appropriately. The present article reviews the pharmacokinetic properties of vancomycin, linezolid, tigecycline and daptomycin. The first major difference between these compounds is their oral bioavailability. Only linezolid can be administered orally, whereas vancomycin, daptomycin and tigecycline are limited to parenteral use. Once in the body, they show very different disposition. Daptomycin has a very small volume of distribution of 7L indicating very little tissue distribution whereas tigecycline has a very large volume of distribution of 350-500 L. Vancomycin and linezolid are in-between with volumes of distribution of approximately 30 and 50 L, close to total body water. However, studies have shown that linezolid shows better tissue penetration than vancomycin. Newer studies using microdialysis, a new technique that allows direct monitoring of unbound tissue levels, support this finding. As far as drug elimination, daptomycin and vancomycin are mainly eliminated into the urine and require dosing adjustments in renally impaired patients, whereas tigecycline is eliminated into the bile and linezolid is metabolized so that in renal patients no dosing adjustments are needed for these compounds. Although the elimination pathways are very different, the resulting half-lives of linezolid, vancomycin, and daptomycin are not greatly different and vary from 4-8 h. Tigecycline, however, has a much longer half-life of up to 1-2 days due to the slow redistribution from tissue binding sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.