Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21163550›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology2011

Skin cancer education and early detection at the beach: a randomized trial of dermatologist examination and biometric feedback.

Karen M Emmons, Alan C Geller, Elaine Puleo, Sanghamitra S Savadatti, Stephanie W Hu, Susan Gorham, Andrew E Werchniak, Dana-Farber Skin Cancer Screening Group

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Screening for reducing morbidity and mortality in malignant melanoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Visual inspection for diagnosing cutaneous melanoma in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Patient follow-up after participating in a beach-based skin cancer screening program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2012
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Melanoma risk in relation to use of sunscreen or other sun protection methods.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karen M EmmonsDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Karen_M_Emmons@dfci.harvard.edu
Alan C Geller
Elaine Puleo
Sanghamitra S Savadatti
Stephanie W Hu
Susan Gorham
Andrew E Werchniak
Dana-Farber Skin Cancer Screening Group

Funding

Dissemination Research to Reduce Cancer DisparitiesK05CA124415 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI EMMONS, KAREN M. · 2007 to 2011
$810k
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA124415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are limited data on the effectiveness of skin cancer prevention education and early detection programs at beaches.

objectivesWe evaluate 4 strategies for addressing skin cancer prevention in beach settings.

methodsThis prospective study at 4 beaches included 4 intervention conditions: (1) education only; (2) education plus biometric feedback; (3) education plus dermatologist skin examination; or (4) education plus biometric feedback and dermatologist skin examination. Outcomes included sun protection behaviors, sunburns, and skin self-examinations.

resultsThere was a significant increase in hat wearing, sunscreen use, and a reduction in sunburns in the education plus biometric feedback group (odds ratio = 1.97, 1.94, and 1.07, respectively), and greater improvements in knowing what to look for in skin-self examinations (odds ratio = 1.13); there were no differences in frequency of self-examinations. Skin examinations plus biometric feedback led to greater reductions in sunburns. The dermatologist examinations identified atypical moles in 28% of participants. LIMITATIONS: Inclusion of only one beach per condition, use of self-report data, and a limited intervention period are limitations.

conclusionsEducation and biometric feedback may be more effective than education alone for impacting sun protective attitudes and behaviors in beachgoing, high-risk populations.

Indexed as

Health EducationPhysical ExaminationAdultBiometryFeedbackFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedPrimary PreventionSelf-ExaminationSkin NeoplasmsSunburnSunscreening AgentsSunscreening Agents

Identifiers

PMID21163550
PMCPMC3158610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.