Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21162635›Full record

ReviewFuture microbiology2011

Future challenges and treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia with emphasis on MRSA.

Rasmus V Rasmussen, Vance G Fowler, Robert Skov, Niels E Bruun

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Complete genome sequencing of three methicillin-resistantMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of methicillin-resistantSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  10. Treatment of MRSA Infection: Where are We?Current medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Rapid detection ofiScience · 2022
    Article
  14. Mechanistic Studies andJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Article
  15. Recent Developments in Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rasmus V RasmussenDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Vance G Fowler
Robert Skov
Niels E Bruun

Funding

Host Susceptibility to S. aureusR01AI068804 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FOWLER, VANCE G. · 2007 to 2016
$6.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI068804NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI068804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is an urgent medical problem due to its growing frequency and its poor associated outcome. As healthcare delivery increasingly involves invasive procedures and implantable devices, the number of patients at risk for SAB and its complications is likely to grow. Compounding this problem is the growing prevalence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and the dwindling efficacy of vancomycin, long the treatment of choice for this pathogen. Despite the recent availability of several new antibiotics for S. aureus, new strategies for treatment and prevention are required for this serious, common cause of human infection.

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaCross InfectionEndocarditisHumansLivestockStaphylococcal InfectionsVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID21162635
PMCPMC3031962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.