Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21162623›Full record

ReviewExpert review of vaccines2011

Vibrio cholerae: lessons for mucosal vaccine design.

Anne L Bishop, Andrew Camilli

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of vaccines, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Outer membrane vesicles inMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Particulate delivery systems for vaccination against bioterrorism agents and emerging infectious pathogens.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne L BishopDepartment of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University School of Medicine and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Andrew Camilli
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USTufts University · US

Funding

Study of transmissible forms of Vibrio CholeraeR01AI055058 · NIAID · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI CAMILLI, ANDREW · 2003 to 2019
$5.8M
STUDY OF VIBRIO INTESTINAL PHYSIOLOGY AND PATHOGENICITYR01AI045746 · NIAID · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI CAMILLI, ANDREW · 2000 to 2016
$5.3M
Phage Resistance in Emergent Vibrio cholerae and Phage Prophylaxis of CholeraR37AI055058 · NIAID · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI Andrew Camilli · 2020 to 2026
$3.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIAID NIH HHS AI045746NIAID NIH HHS AI055058NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI045746NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI055058NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI055058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of Vibrio cholerae to persist in bodies of water will continue to confound our ability to eradicate cholera through improvements to infrastructure, and thus cholera vaccines are needed. We aim for an inexpensive vaccine that can provide long-lasting protection from all epidemic cholera infections, currently caused by O1 or O139 serogroups. Recent insights into correlates of protection, epidemiology and pathogenesis may help us design improved vaccines. This notwithstanding, we have come to appreciate that even marginally protective vaccines, such as oral whole-cell killed vaccines, if widely distributed, can provide significant protection, owing to herd immunity. Further efforts are still required to provide more effective protection of young children.

Indexed as

Administration, MucosalCholeraCholera VaccinesHumansImmunity, HerdVaccinationVaccines, InactivatedVibrio cholerae O1Vibrio cholerae O139Cholera VaccinesVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID21162623
PMCPMC3036168
OpenAlexW2021918725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.