Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21162599›Full record

ReviewPaediatric drugs2011

Disease registries and outcomes research in children: focus on lysosomal storage disorders.

Simon Jones, Emma James, Suyash Prasad

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Paediatric drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Simon JonesWillink Unit, Genetic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, St Marys Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Emma James
Suyash Prasad
GVD Corporation (United States) · USSt Mary's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing medicines specifically for use in children has been neglected in the past, with the majority of formal clinical studies being conducted in adults. Clinical trials are a pivotal part of the drug approval process; however, they are not always applicable to the diverse populations - including children - that receive the drug after approval. They may not be the most informative assessment tool, especially in rare (or orphan) disorders where there are few patients, due to a lack of existing natural history data and the challenges of designing appropriately powered statistical analyses. Disease registries, which can collect clinical information in larger, more heterogeneous populations than can be included in a clinical trial, are becoming increasingly valuable. Their use is particularly beneficial for diseases affecting very small patient populations, such as lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs), and for looking at specific populations, for example, children. Such disease registries can provide natural history data as well as enable the impact of therapy to be examined. Moreover, despite potential limitations of enrollment bias and unmonitored data, patient registries can play a valuable role in assuring pediatric health, providing longitudinal data that can be used to monitor developmental outcomes in chronic lifelong diseases, and assessing the effectiveness of treatment. This review describes the role of registries in drug development and regulatory approval, the impact of global registry programs on pediatric research, with some examples from the field of LSDs, and how registries are impacting the clinical care such children receive.

Indexed as

RegistriesAdultAnimalsChildClinical Trials as TopicData CollectionDrug ApprovalDrug DesignHumansLysosomal Storage DiseasesOutcome Assessment, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID21162599
OpenAlexW109669460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.