ReviewPaediatric drugs2011
Disease registries and outcomes research in children: focus on lysosomal storage disorders.
Review in Paediatric drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pediatric biobanks to enhance clinical and translational research for children.European journal of pediatrics · 2023Review
- Access to medicines for rare diseases: A European regulatory roadmap for academia.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- International pediatric thrombosis network to advance pediatric thrombosis research: Communication from the ISTH SSC subcommittee on pediatric and neonatal thrombosis and hemostasis.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2021Article
- Patient Registries and Their Governance: A Pilot Study and RecommendationsIndiana health law review · 2019Article
- Using a meta-narrative literature review and focus groups with key stakeholders to identify perceived challenges and solutions for generating robust evidence on the effectiveness of treatments for rare diseases.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2018Review
- Ten years of the Hunter Outcome Survey (HOS): insights, achievements, and lessons learned from a global patient registry.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2017Review
- The Canadian Biliary Atresia Registry: Improving the care of Canadian infants with biliary atresia.Paediatrics & child health · 2016Article
- Methodology of clinical research in rare diseases: development of a research program in juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (JNCL) via creation of a patient registry and collaboration with patient advocates.Contemporary clinical trials · 2013Article
- Clinical studies in lysosomal storage diseases: Past, present, and future.Rare diseases (Austin, Tex.) · 2013Review
- Standardization of Questions in Rare Disease Registries: The PRISM Library Project.Interactive journal of medical research · 2012Article
- Limitations of drug registries to evaluate orphan medicinal products for the treatment of lysosomal storage disorders.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing medicines specifically for use in children has been neglected in the past, with the majority of formal clinical studies being conducted in adults. Clinical trials are a pivotal part of the drug approval process; however, they are not always applicable to the diverse populations - including children - that receive the drug after approval. They may not be the most informative assessment tool, especially in rare (or orphan) disorders where there are few patients, due to a lack of existing natural history data and the challenges of designing appropriately powered statistical analyses. Disease registries, which can collect clinical information in larger, more heterogeneous populations than can be included in a clinical trial, are becoming increasingly valuable. Their use is particularly beneficial for diseases affecting very small patient populations, such as lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs), and for looking at specific populations, for example, children. Such disease registries can provide natural history data as well as enable the impact of therapy to be examined. Moreover, despite potential limitations of enrollment bias and unmonitored data, patient registries can play a valuable role in assuring pediatric health, providing longitudinal data that can be used to monitor developmental outcomes in chronic lifelong diseases, and assessing the effectiveness of treatment. This review describes the role of registries in drug development and regulatory approval, the impact of global registry programs on pediatric research, with some examples from the field of LSDs, and how registries are impacting the clinical care such children receive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.