Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21162561›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science & technology2011

Bacteria in beach sands: an emerging challenge in protecting coastal water quality and bather health.

Elizabeth Halliday, Rebecca J Gast

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science & technology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Review of the Human Health Risks from Microbial Hazards in Recreational Beach Sand.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. FEMS microbes · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Quantifying the Viral Reduction Achieved Using Ash and Sand as Handwashing Agents.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Microbial Source Tracking as a Method of Determination of Beach Sand Contamination.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Climate Change Impacts on Microbiota in Beach Sand and Water: Looking Ahead.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. blaEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth HallidayWoods Hole Center for Ocean and Human Health, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA. ehalliday@whoi.edu
Rebecca J Gast

Funding

Woods Hole Center for Oceans and Human HealthP50ES012742 · NIEHS · WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION · PI STEGEMAN, JOHN J · 2004 to 2009
$2.8M
NIEHS NIH HHS P50 ES012742NIEHS NIH HHS P50ES012742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To protect bather health at recreational beaches, fecal indicator bacterial standards are used to monitor water quality, and waters exceeding the standards are subsequently closed to bathers. However beachgoers are also in contact with beach sands, the sanitary quality of which is not included within beach monitoring programs. In fact, sands and sediments provide habitat where fecal bacterial populations may persist, and in some cases grow, in the coastal zone. Specific pathogens are less well studied in beach sands and sediments, but there is a body of evidence that they too may persist in these environments. This paper reviews the current state of knowledge regarding the abundance and distribution of fecal indicator bacteria and pathogens in beach sands of diverse climatological regions, and at beaches subjected to varied levels of anthropogenic impact. In all regions fecal indicator bacteria are nearly ubiquitous in beach sands, and similar relationships emerge among fecal indicator abundance in dry sand, submerged sands, and water. Taken together, these studies contextualize a potential public health issue and identify research questions that must be addressed in order to support future policy decisions.

Indexed as

BacteriaBathing BeachesConservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PolicyFecesFresh WaterGeologic SedimentsSeawaterSewageUnited StatesWater PollutantsSewageWater Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID21162561
PMCPMC3109870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.