ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2011
AED discontinuation may not be dangerous in seizure-free patients.
Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Risk factors for 5-year recurrence of spontaneous symptomatic epileptic seizures in infants and young children].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2016Article
- Antiepileptic Drug Withdrawal in Dogs with Epilepsy.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2015Article
- The dynamics of the epileptic brain reveal long-memory processes.Frontiers in neurology · 2014Article
- AED discontinuation may be dangerous for seizure-free patients.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2011Review
- Stay, Hit, or Fold? What Do You Do If the Treatment May Be as Bad as the Problem-Results of a Q-PULSE Survey.Epilepsy currentsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The decision to continue or to stop anticonvulsant treatment in patients with prolonged seizure remission is still a matter of debate. There is no evidence that continued treatment guarantees permanent seizure freedom. Up to 50% of patients achieve terminal remission (i.e., off drugs). Almost one-half of patients with untreated epilepsy are seizure-free for more than 5 years and the number of those with continuing seizures tends to decrease over time. In contrast, a substantial fraction of patients on chronic treatment with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may be exposed to clinically relevant adverse effects. Other disadvantages of continuing treatment indefinitely include the teratogenic risk, drug interactions, and the concern that AEDs may be unnecessary. The probability of remaining seizure-free after treatment discontinuation is about 70% at 2 years. Although different combinations of factors are thought to affect the risk of relapse, the prediction of individual outcome before withdrawal remains uncertain. As a consequence, the decision to withdraw or withhold treatment must be still individualized. In any patient, the decision to discontinue treatment should also take into account social aspects like driving license, job and leisure activities as well as emotional and personal factors and adverse effects or drug interactions. Patients will ultimately have to decide themselves whether they wish to discontinue drug treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.