ArticleParasitology research2011
Expressed sequence tags from Eimeria brunetti--preliminary analysis and functional annotation.
Article in Parasitology research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcriptome profiling of the fifth-stage larvae of Angiostrongylus cantonensis by next-generation sequencing.Parasitology research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
As a first attempt to generate sequence information from the protein-coding genes of the genomically unknown parasite, Eimeria brunetti, a cDNA library was generated from purified sporozoites in the λTriplEx2™ vector. Analysis of 283 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from the cDNA library constructed revealed 12 contigs (26 ESTs) and 257 singletons. BLASTx analysis revealed that 50 transcripts had significant matches to known proteins, whereas the remaining 233 had no significant matches, probably representing novel genes. Based on Gene Ontology classification, the transcripts were categorized as biological process (46 ESTs), molecular function (37 ESTs), and cellular component (19 ESTs). The transcripts analyzed show maximum homology to the apicomplexan parasite Toxoplasma gondii. Despite the small number of transcripts, this is the first transcriptome analysis of E. brunetti and provides preliminary data that will increase understanding of parasite biological function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.